}
}

type PodNetnsFinder interface {
	FindNetnsForPods(filter map[types.UID]*corev1.Pod) (PodToNetns, error)
}

type PodNetnsProcFinder struct {
	proc fs.FS
}

func NewPodNetnsProcFinder(proc fs.FS) *PodNetnsProcFinder {
	return &PodNetnsProcFinder{proc: proc}
}

func isNotNumber(r rune) bool {
	return r < '0' || r > '9'
}

(https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance) | [amd64](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-amd64), [arm64](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-arm64), [ppc64le](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-ppc64le), [s390x](https://...

<dependencies>
  ...
</dependencies>
    ]]></configuration>
    <description>
      <![CDATA[
      This is a set of Artifact instances resolved from the set of dependencies for
      the current project.

      NOTE: This will likely contain much more than the direct dependencies of the
      current POM, since Maven uses transitive, or chained, dependency resolution.
    ]]></description>
  </expression>
  <expression>

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

import java.net.URI;

/**
 * Provides access to the contents of a POM independently of the backing store (e.g. file system, database, memory).
 * <p>
 * Unlike {@link ModelSource}, this interface supports loading of parent POM(s) from the same backing store and allows
 * construction of MavenProject instances without the need to have parent POM(s) available from local or remote
 * repositories.
 * <p>

(https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance) | [amd64](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-amd64), [arm64](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-arm64), [ppc64le](https://console.cloud.google.com/artifacts/docker/k8s-artifacts-prod/southamerica-east1/images/conformance-ppc64le), [s390x](https://...

injection labels.`,
		Example: `  # Create a revision tag from the "1-8-0" revision
  istioctl tag set prod --revision 1-8-0

  # Point namespace "test-ns" at the revision pointed to by the "prod" revision tag
  kubectl label ns test-ns istio.io/rev=prod

  # Change the revision tag to reference the "1-8-1" revision
  istioctl tag set prod --revision 1-8-1 --overwrite

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

	processIORCharBytesMD             = NewCounterMD(processIORCharBytes, "Total bytes read by the process from the underlying storage system including cache, /proc/[pid]/io rchar")
	processIOReadBytesMD              = NewCounterMD(processIOReadBytes, "Total bytes read by the process from the underlying storage system, /proc/[pid]/io read_bytes")

     * This is typically the directory containing the POM file being executed.
     *
     * @return the top-level directory path
     */
    @Nonnull
    Path topDirectory();

    /**
     * Returns the root directory of the Maven invocation, if found. This is determined by the presence of a
     * {@code .mvn} directory or a POM with the root="true" property but is not always applicable (ie invocation