// Tests hashing order to fail for when order is '-1'.
	if hashedOrder := hashOrder("This will fail", -1); hashedOrder != nil {
		t.Errorf("Test: Expect \"nil\" but failed \"%#v\"", hashedOrder)
	}

	if hashedOrder := hashOrder("This will fail", 0); hashedOrder != nil {
		t.Errorf("Test: Expect \"nil\" but failed \"%#v\"", hashedOrder)
	}
}

func TestShuffleDisks(t *testing.T) {
	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(t.Context())

Ambas dependencias solo devolverán un error HTTP si el usuario no existe, o si está inactivo.

Así que, en nuestro endpoint, solo obtendremos un usuario si el usuario existe, fue autenticado correctamente, y está activo:

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[58:66,69:74,94] *}

/// info | Información

        // Verify required methods exist
        try {
            CustomSizeValidator.class.getMethod("initialize", CustomSize.class);
            CustomSizeValidator.class.getMethod("isValid", CharSequence.class, ConstraintValidatorContext.class);
            assertTrue("Required methods exist", true);
        } catch (final NoSuchMethodException e) {
            fail("Required methods should exist: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

    /**
     * Test method for
     * {@link org.codelibs.core.convert.BinaryConversionUtil#toBinary(java.lang.Object)}
     * .
     */
    @Test
    public void testToBinaryException() {
        exception.expect(ClIllegalArgumentException.class);
        exception.expectMessage(is("[ECL0009]argument[o] is illegal. because class java.lang.Object."));
        BinaryConversionUtil.toBinary(new Object());
    }

Otherwise, when filing an issue, make sure to answer these five questions:

1. What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?
2. What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
3. What did you do?
4. What did you expect to see?
5. What did you see instead?

For change proposals, see [Proposing Changes To Go](https://go.dev/s/proposal-process).

## Contributing code

#!/bin/bash

export CGO_ENABLED=0
for dir in docs/debugging/*/; do
	bin=$(basename ${dir})
	go build -C ${dir} -o ${PWD}/${bin}

        }
    }

    public void test_methodsExist() {
        // Verify that processWebInfLib method is overridden (it's protected so we can't call it directly)
        try {
            final java.lang.reflect.Method method = FessWebResourceRoot.class.getDeclaredMethod("processWebInfLib");
            assertNotNull("processWebInfLib method should exist", method);

  # VMs.
  pyenv install -s "3.11"
  if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
    pyenv local "3.11"
    export CLOUDSDK_PYTHON=$(pyenv which python3.11)
  else
    echo "Python 3.11 not found, falling back to system python"
    export CLOUDSDK_PYTHON=$(which python3)
  fi
  gcloud auth activate-service-account --key-file="${GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS}"
fi
set -x

    static final int FILE_SUPERSEDE = 0x0;

    /* Open the file or fail if it does not exist
     * aka OPEN_EXISTING
     */

    static final int FILE_OPEN = 0x1;

    /* Create the file or fail if it does not exist
     * aka CREATE_NEW
     */

    static final int FILE_CREATE = 0x2;

    /* Open the file or create it if it does not exist
     * aka OPEN_ALWAYS
     */

    static final int FILE_OPEN_IF = 0x3;