Especificamente, observa-se Uvicorn, Starlette e FastAPI comparados juntos (entre muitas outras ferramentas).

Quanto mais simples o problema resolvido pela ferramenta, melhor a performance que ela terá. E a maioria dos _benchmarks_ não testam as características adicionais fornecidas pela ferramenta.

A hierarquia segue assim:

* **Uvicorn**: um servidor ASGI
    * **Starlette**: (utiliza Uvicorn) um _microframework web_

 * proportional to the highest valued character that has a replacement. For example a replacement
 * map containing the single character '{@literal \}u1000' will require approximately 16K of memory.
 * As such sharing this data structure between escaper instances is the primary goal of this class.
 *
 * @author David Beaumont
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class ArrayBasedEscaperMap {
  /**

              .addTrustedCertificate((X509Certificate) isgCertificate)
              // Uncomment to allow connection to any site generally, but will cause
              // noticeable memory pressure in Android apps.
//              .addPlatformTrustedCertificates()
              .build();

      builder.sslSocketFactory(certificates.sslSocketFactory(), certificates.trustManager());
    }

  public abstract HashCode hashBytes(byte[] input, int off, int len);

  @Override
  public HashCode hashBytes(ByteBuffer input) {
    return newHasher(input.remaining()).putBytes(input).hash();
  }

  /** In-memory stream-based implementation of Hasher. */
  private final class BufferingHasher extends AbstractHasher {
    final ExposedByteArrayOutputStream stream;

    BufferingHasher(int expectedInputSize) {

Isso significa que o **FastAPI** foi testado especificamente com os editores usados por 80% dos desenvolvedores Python. Como a maioria dos outros editores tendem a funcionar de forma similar, todos os seus benefícios devem funcionar para virtualmente todos os editores.

En la mayoría de los casos tendrías (y deberías) tener un "proxy de terminación" manejando HTTPS por ti, esto dependerá de cómo despliegues tu aplicación, tu proveedor podría hacer esto por ti, o podrías necesitar configurarlo tú mismo.

 * }
 * public void testFooLeak() {
 *   GcFinalization.awaitClear(fooWeakRef());
 * }
 * }
 *
 * <p>This class cannot currently be used to test soft references, since this class does not try to
 * create the memory pressure required to cause soft references to be cleared.
 *
 * <p>This class only provides testing utilities. It is not designed for direct use in production or
 * for benchmarking.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher

 * <p>
 * Unlike a cache, this session data is not subject to purging. For this same reason, session data should also not be
 * abused as a cache (i.e. for storing values that can be re-calculated) to avoid memory exhaustion.
 * <p>
 * <strong>Note:</strong> Actual implementations must be thread-safe.
 *
 * @see Session#getData()
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@ThreadSafe
@Provider
public interface SessionData {

   */
  @Override
  List<V> createCollection() {
    return new ArrayList<>(expectedValuesPerKey);
  }

  /**
   * Reduces the memory used by this {@code ArrayListMultimap}, if feasible.
   *
   * @deprecated For a {@link ListMultimap} that automatically trims to size, use {@link

      description: If compiling from source
  - type: input
    id: Cuda
    attributes:
      label: CUDA/cuDNN version
  - type: input
    id: Gpu
    attributes:
      label: GPU model and memory
      description: If compiling from source
  - type: textarea
    id: what-happened
    attributes:
      label: Current behavior?
      description: Also tell us, what did you expect to happen?