}

    String readString( byte[] src, int srcIndex, int len ) {
        String str = null;
        try {
            if( useUnicode ) {
                // should Unicode alignment be corrected for here?
                str = new String( src, srcIndex, len, UNI_ENCODING );
            } else {
    
                /* On NT without Unicode the fileNameLength

                                        /* 6 zeros observed with NT */
        writeInt8( 0L, dst, dstIndex ); dstIndex += 6;

                /* Also observed 4 byte alignment but we stick
                 * with the default for jCIFS which is 2 */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }
    int readSetupWireFormat( byte[] buffer, int bufferIndex, int len ) {
        return 0;
    }

        dstIndex += this.info.encode(dst, dstIndex);

        /* 6 zeros observed with NT */
        SMBUtil.writeInt8(0L, dst, dstIndex);
        dstIndex += 6;

        /*
         * Also observed 4 byte alignment but we stick
         * with the default for jCIFS which is 2
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }


    @Override

    }
    int writeString( String str, byte[] dst, int dstIndex, boolean useUnicode ) {
        int start = dstIndex;

        try {
            if( useUnicode ) {
                // Unicode requires word alignment
                if((( dstIndex - headerStart ) % 2 ) != 0 ) {
                    dst[dstIndex++] = (byte)'\0';
                }
                System.arraycopy( str.getBytes( UNI_ENCODING ), 0,

   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.
  public void testExhaustive() throws Exception {

                // == 5*128 = 640

                // . and .. entries = 200 byte (includes alignment)

                // + 64 byte header
                // + 8 byte query response overhead
                // + 110 bytes entry
                // -> 1022 predicted message size <= 1023 maximum buffer size
                // 112 bytes to alignment
                // -> aligned to 1024 > 1023 maximum buffer size

    }


    protected int writeString ( String str, byte[] dst, int dstIndex, boolean unicode ) {
        int start = dstIndex;
        if ( unicode ) {
            // Unicode requires word alignment
            if ( ( ( dstIndex - this.headerStart ) % 2 ) != 0 ) {
                dst[ dstIndex++ ] = (byte) '\0';
            }
            System.arraycopy(Strings.getUNIBytes(str), 0, dst, dstIndex, str.length() * 2);

   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.
  public void testExhaustive() throws Exception {

	{[]byte("a"), nil, 1},
	{nil, []byte("a"), -1},
}

func TestCompare(t *testing.T) {
	for _, tt := range compareTests {
		numShifts := 16
		buffer := make([]byte, len(tt.b)+numShifts)
		// vary the input alignment of tt.b
		for offset := 0; offset <= numShifts; offset++ {
			shiftedB := buffer[offset : len(tt.b)+offset]
			copy(shiftedB, tt.b)
			cmp := Compare(tt.a, shiftedB)
			if cmp != tt.i {

	actions        [lifecycle.ActionCount]uint64
	actionsLatency [lifecycle.ActionCount]lockedLastMinuteLatency

	// currentPaths contains (string,*currentPathTracker) for each disk processing.
	// Alignment not required.
	currentPaths sync.Map

	cycleInfoMu sync.Mutex
	cycleInfo   *currentScannerCycle
}

var globalScannerMetrics scannerMetrics

const (
	// START Realtime metrics, that only to records