if (e != null) {
                logger.error(e.getMessage());

                for (Throwable cause = e.getCause();
                        cause != null && cause != cause.getCause();
                        cause = cause.getCause()) {
                    logger.error("Caused by: {}", cause.getMessage());
                }
            }
        }
    }

 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public class SettingsBuildingException extends Exception {

    private final List<SettingsProblem> problems;

    /**
     * Creates a new exception with the specified problems.
     *
     * @param problems The problems that cause this exception, may be {@code null}.
     */

            Interface12.class,
            Interface1.class,
            Interface2.class,
            Class1.class,
            Object.class);
    makeUnmodifiable(types.interfaces().rawTypes())
        .containsExactly(
            Interface3.class,
            Interface12.class,
            Interface1.class,
            Interface2.class,
            Iterable.class);
    makeUnmodifiable(types.classes().rawTypes())

        final Exception cause = new RuntimeException("Underlying error");

        // Execute
        final InvalidQueryException exception = new InvalidQueryException(null, message, cause);

        // Verify
        assertNotNull(exception);
        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertEquals(cause, exception.getCause());
        assertNull(exception.getMessageCode());

        // Test constructor with message and Exception cause
        String message = "SSO token validation error";
        Exception cause = new RuntimeException("Invalid token format");
        SsoProcessException exception = new SsoProcessException(message, cause);

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertEquals(cause, exception.getCause());
    }

    @Test

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

)

// Standard constants for all storage class
const (
	// Reduced redundancy storage class
	RRS = "REDUCED_REDUNDANCY"
	// Standard storage class
	STANDARD = "STANDARD"
)

// Standard constants for config info storage class
const (
	ClassStandard = "standard"
	ClassRRS      = "rrs"
	Optimize      = "optimize"
	InlineBlock   = "inline_block"

	// Reduced redundancy storage class environment variable

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>