tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

### Properties in entirely new classes

When developing an entirely new class (task, extension, domain object, etc), the API should consist of managed lazy properties.

Preferably, these new classes should be 100% managed and have their implementation generated by Gradle at runtime.

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a prior call that had caused this thread to block or wait has since returned
   * normally.
   */
  public void assertPriorCallReturns(@Nullable String methodName) throws Exception {
    assertEquals(null, getResponse(methodName).getResult());
  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a prior call that had caused this thread to block or wait has since returned the
   * expected boolean value.

something()
```

⚖️

```Python
something(some_argument, some_keyword_argument="foo")
```

⤴️ ⚫️ "🇧🇲".

## 🎓 🔗

👆 5️⃣📆 👀 👈 ✍ 👐 🐍 🎓, 👆 ⚙️ 👈 🎏 ❕.

🖼:

```Python
class Cat:
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name


fluffy = Cat(name="Mr Fluffy")
```

👉 💼, `fluffy` 👐 🎓 `Cat`.

& ✍ `fluffy`, 👆 "🤙" `Cat`.

, 🐍 🎓 **🇧🇲**.

または

```Python
something(some_argument, some_keyword_argument="foo")
```

これを「呼び出し可能」なものと呼びます。

## 依存関係としてのクラス

Pythonのクラスのインスタンスを作成する際に、同じ構文を使用していることに気づくかもしれません。

例えば:

```Python
class Cat:
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name


fluffy = Cat(name="Mr Fluffy")
```

この場合、`fluffy`は`Cat`クラスのインスタンスです。

そして`fluffy`を作成するために、`Cat`を「呼び出している」ことになります。

something(some_argument, some_keyword_argument="foo")
```

상기와 같은 방식으로 "호출(실행)" 할 수 있다면 "호출 가능"이 됩니다.

## 의존성으로서의 클래스

파이썬 클래스의 인스턴스를 생성하기 위해 사용하는 것과 동일한 문법을 사용한다는 걸 알 수 있습니다.

예를 들어:

```Python
class Cat:
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name


fluffy = Cat(name="Mr Fluffy")
```

이 경우에 `fluffy`는 클래스 `Cat`의 인스턴스입니다. 그리고 우리는 `fluffy`를 만들기 위해서 `Cat`을 "호출"했습니다.

something()
```

或者

```Python
something(some_argument, some_keyword_argument="foo")
```

这就是 "可调用对象"。

## 类作为依赖项

您可能会注意到，要创建一个 Python 类的实例，您可以使用相同的语法。

举个例子:

```Python
class Cat:
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name


fluffy = Cat(name="Mr Fluffy")
```

在这个例子中, `fluffy` 是一个 `Cat` 类的实例。

为了创建 `fluffy`，你调用了 `Cat` 。

所以，Python 类也是 **可调用对象**。