TestAllocInfo allocInfo = new TestAllocInfo(0, free);

            // When & Then
            assertEquals(free, allocInfo.getFree());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle overflow scenarios")
        void shouldHandleOverflowScenarios() {
            // Given - capacity at max, free space at max
            TestAllocInfo allocInfo = new TestAllocInfo(Long.MAX_VALUE, Long.MAX_VALUE);

func isValidArithOperator(op string) bool {
	switch op {
	case opPlus:
	case opMinus:
	case opDivide:
	case opMultiply:
	case opModulo:
	default:
		return false
	}
	return true
}

// Overflow errors are ignored.
func intArithOp(op string, left, right int64) (int64, error) {
	switch op {
	case opPlus:
		return left + right, nil
	case opMinus:
		return left - right, nil
	case opDivide:

	instructions["JNS"] = x86.AJPL  /* alternate */
	instructions["JNZ"] = x86.AJNE  /* alternate */
	instructions["JO"] = x86.AJOS   /* alternate */
	instructions["JOC"] = x86.AJOC  /* overflow clear (OF = 0) */
	instructions["JOS"] = x86.AJOS  /* overflow set (OF = 1) */
	instructions["JP"] = x86.AJPS   /* alternate */
	instructions["JPC"] = x86.AJPC  /* parity clear (PF = 0) */
	instructions["JPE"] = x86.AJPS  /* alternate */

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

    accumulator.add(ONE_VALUE, OTHER_ONE_VALUE);
    for (int power = 1; power < Long.SIZE - 1; power++) {
      accumulator.addAll(accumulator.snapshot());
    }
    // Should overflow without throwing.
    accumulator.addAll(accumulator.snapshot());
    assertThat(accumulator.count()).isLessThan(0L);
  }

  public void testXStats() {

        if (!sizeIfKnown.isPresent()) {
          return Optional.absent();
        }
        result += sizeIfKnown.get();
        if (result < 0) {
          // Overflow (or one or more sources that returned a negative size, but all bets are off in
          // that case)
          // Can't represent anything higher, and realistically there probably isn't anything that

  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> ArrayList<E> newArrayList(E... elements) {
    checkNotNull(elements); // for GWT
    // Avoid integer overflow when a large array is passed in
    int capacity = computeArrayListCapacity(elements.length);
    ArrayList<E> list = new ArrayList<>(capacity);
    Collections.addAll(list, elements);
    return list;
  }

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~