* There are a number of ways to solve this, none of which are very pretty, and it is currently
   * believed to be a purely theoretical problem (since the other actions should supply sufficient
   * write-barriers).
   */

  @LazyInit private @Nullable ListenableFuture<V> delegateRef;
  @LazyInit private @Nullable ScheduledFuture<?> timer;

  private TimeoutFuture(ListenableFuture<V> delegate) {

        assertNotNull(specialProvider);
        assertEquals(Long.valueOf(4096L), specialConfig.getTimeAdjustTimeMillisAsLong());
    }

    // Test memory efficiency with multiple providers
    public void test_memoryEfficiency() {
        // Create and discard multiple providers
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {

  scheme: http
  static_configs:
  - targets: ['localhost:9000']
```

#### 3.2 Public Prometheus config

If Prometheus endpoint authentication type is set to `public`. Following prometheus config is sufficient to start scraping metrics data from MinIO.
This can be collected from any server once per collection.

##### Cluster

```yaml
scrape_configs:
- job_name: minio-job

        // Verify FID is written correctly (little-endian)
        int writtenFid = SMBUtil.readInt2(dst, 2);
        assertEquals(TEST_FID, writtenFid);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeDataWireFormat with sufficient buffer")
    void testWriteDataWireFormatSufficientBuffer() {
        // Arrange
        TransTransactNamedPipe trans = new TransTransactNamedPipe(mockConfig, TEST_FID, TEST_DATA, TEST_OFFSET, TEST_LENGTH);

 *
 * Note that any other form is unsupported. You may not use asterisks in any position other than
 * the leftmost label.
 *
 * If multiple patterns match a hostname, any match is sufficient. For example, suppose pin A
 * applies to `*.publicobject.com` and pin B applies to `api.publicobject.com`. Handshakes for
 * `api.publicobject.com` are valid if either A's or B's certificate is in the chain.
 *

            });

            // Capacity should not be negative (overflow check)
            assertTrue(info.getCapacity() != 0);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should decode efficiently for large buffers")
        void testLargeBufferDecoding() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] largeBuffer = new byte[10000];
            FileFsSizeInformation info = new FileFsSizeInformation();

    }

    /**
     * Creates a basic negotiate response buffer with minimum valid structure.
     */
    private byte[] createBasicNegotiateResponseBuffer() {
        byte[] buffer = new byte[300]; // Sufficient size for basic structure + offsets

        // Structure size (65)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(65, buffer, 0);

        // Security mode

            // Optimization: Use larger block sizes for better performance
            final int optimizedBlockSize = Math.min(blockSize * 2, 64 * 1024); // Cap at 64KB for memory efficiency
            final int effectiveBlockSize = Math.max(blockSize, optimizedBlockSize);

            SmbComReadAndXResponse response = null;
            if (!th.isSMB2()) {

 *
 * We strongly suggest that you create an explicit {@link jcifs.context.CIFSContextWrapper}
 * with your desired config. It's base implementation {@link jcifs.context.BaseContext}
 * should be sufficient for most needs.
 *
 * If you want to retain the classic singleton behavior you can use
 * {@link jcifs.context.SingletonContext#getInstance()}
 * witch is initialized using system properties.
 *
 */

	"time"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/grid"
	xnet "github.com/minio/pkg/v3/net"
)

// Storage REST server, storageRESTReceiver and StorageRESTClient are
// inter-dependent, below test functions are sufficient to test all of them.
func testStorageAPIDiskInfo(t *testing.T, storage StorageAPI) {
	testCases := []struct {
		expectErr bool
	}{
		{true},
	}

	for i, testCase := range testCases {