* These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *
     * Note that testing casValue is particularly dangerous because it uses Unsafe under some
     * versions of Java, and apparently Unsafe can cause SIGSEGV instead of NPE—almost as if it's

        int contextOffset = SMBUtil.readInt4(buffer, 28);
        assertTrue(contextOffset > 0);

        // Skip detailed context verification since we can't access headerStart
        // Just verify that contexts were written
        assertTrue(bytesWritten > 60); // Should be larger than basic negotiate request
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle empty negotiate contexts array")

        verify(mockResponse, never()).setStatus(any(int.class));
    }

    /**
     * Test case for the instance method doAuthentication.
     * It should just delegate to the static authenticate method.
     * @throws IOException
     */
    @Test
    public void testDoAuthentication() throws IOException {
        // Setup: No "Authorization" header to follow a simple path

        String stringRep = transformHeader.toString();

        // Then
        assertNotNull(stringRep);
        assertTrue(stringRep.contains("Smb2TransformHeader"));
        // toString() implementation may vary, just check it's not null and not empty
        assertFalse(stringRep.isEmpty());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should generate correct associated data for AEAD")
    void testGetAssociatedData() {

		if missingPartsHeal == 1 {
			return newBuf, errFileNotFound
		} else if bitrotHeal == 1 {
			return newBuf, errFileCorrupt
		}
		return newBuf, nil
	}

	// If we cannot decode, just return read quorum error.
	return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w (offline-disks=%d/%d)", errErasureReadQuorum, disksNotFound, len(p.readers))
}

// Decode reads from readers, reconstructs data if needed and writes the data to the writer.

        List<RelatedContent> testData = new ArrayList<>();
        testData.add(createRelatedContent("regex:", "Invalid Regex", ""));
        mockBhv.setTestData(testData);

        // Should not throw exception, just log warning
        relatedContentHelper.load();

        String[] results = relatedContentHelper.getRelatedContents("anything");
        assertEquals(0, results.length);
    }

            readThreads[i] = new Thread(() -> {
                for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
                    List<DirectoryCacheEntry.FileInfo> children = entry.getChildren();
                    // Just read, don't assert specific counts due to race conditions
                    assertNotNull(children);
                }
            });
            readThreads[i].start();
        }

                atTotal += pool.Available
                if atTotal > choose && pool.Available > 0 {
                        return pool.Index
                }
        }
        // Should not happen, but print values just in case.
        panic(fmt.Errorf("reached end of serverPools (total: %v, atTotal: %v, choose: %v)", total, atTotal, choose))
}
```

## Other usages

### Advanced use cases with multiple ellipses

You do that with standard modern Python types.

You don't have to learn a new syntax, the methods or classes of a specific library, etc.

Just standard **Python**.

For example, for an `int`:

```Python
item_id: int
```

or for a more complex `Item` model:

```Python
item: Item
```

      /*
       * Assume that equals uses the == optimization when appropriate, and that
       * it would check hash codes as an optimization when appropriate. If we
       * did these things, it would just make things worse for the most
       * performance-conscious users.
       */
      if (key.equals(candidateKey)) {
        return entry.getValue();
      }
    }
    return null;
  }