"scheduledTasks=[task two, task one]",
    )

    taskFaker.advanceUntil(200.µs)
    assertThat(log).containsExactly(
      "scheduledTasks=[task two, task one]",
      "scheduledTasks=[task one]",
    )

    taskFaker.advanceUntil(300.µs)
    assertThat(log).containsExactly(
      "scheduledTasks=[task two, task one]",
      "scheduledTasks=[task one]",
      "scheduledTasks=[]",
    )

"_REST API를 만들기 위해 **현대적인 프레임워크**를 찾고 있다면 **FastAPI**를 확인해 보십시오. [...] 빠르고, 쓰기 쉽고, 배우기도 쉽습니다 [...]_"

"_우리 **API**를 **FastAPI**로 바꿨습니다  [...] 아마 여러분도 좋아하실 것입니다 [...]_"

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = {ZERO, ONE})
  public void testRetainAll_subset() {
    expectReturnsTrue(nonEmptyProperSubset);
    expectContents(nonEmptyProperSubset.toRetain);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = {ZERO, ONE})
  public void testRetainAll_subsetUnsupported() {
    expectThrows(nonEmptyProperSubset);

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

   * that returns a {@code ClosingFuture} to its value. The function can use a {@link
   * DeferredCloser} to capture objects to be closed when the pipeline is done (other than those
   * captured by the returned {@link ClosingFuture}).
   *
   * <p>If this {@code ClosingFuture} succeeds, the derived one will be equivalent to the one
   * returned by the function.
   *