assertTrue(s.contains(",informationLevel=0x104"), "toString should include information level 0x104");
        assertTrue(s.contains(",resumeKey=0x0304"), "toString should include lower 16-bit resumeKey hex");
        assertTrue(s.contains(",flags=0x00"), "toString should include flags in hex");
        assertTrue(s.endsWith("]"), "toString should end with closing bracket");
    }

  // array. The top bits of this value are the remaining bits of the hash value that were not used
  // in the short hash. We saw that a mask of 0x7f would keep the 7-bit value 0x6f from a full
  // hashcode of 0x89abcdef. The imaginary `hash` value would then be the remaining top 25 bits,
  // 0x89abcd80. To this is added (or'd) the `next` value, which is an index within `entries`

    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("int32Provider")
    @DisplayName("readParameterWordsWireFormat correctly decodes 32-bit offset")
    void testReadParameterWords(int expectedInt, byte[] bytes) {
        // The implementation reads via SMBUtil.readInt4 which returns an int
        // When assigned to a long field, it gets sign-extended

# Separate OpenAPI Schemas for Input and Output or Not { #separate-openapi-schemas-for-input-and-output-or-not }

Since **Pydantic v2** was released, the generated OpenAPI is a bit more exact and **correct** than before. 😎

In fact, in some cases, it will even have **two JSON Schemas** in OpenAPI for the same Pydantic model, for input and output, depending on if they have **default values**.

Let's see how that works and how to change it if you need to do that.

### Server-Side Encryption with client-provided Keys

        .isNotEqualTo(fingerprint(stringB.getBytes(UTF_8)));

    // ISO 8859-1 only has 0-255 (ubyte) representation so throws away UTF-8 characters
    // greater than 127 (ie with their top bit set).
    // Don't attempt to do this in real code.
    assertEquals(
        fingerprint(stringA.getBytes(ISO_8859_1)), fingerprint(stringB.getBytes(ISO_8859_1)));
  }

  public void testMumurHash64() {

      // to ensure the first test of either value will fail.
      safeMax = -1;
      safeMin = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    }
    this.safeMin = safeMin;
    this.safeMax = safeMax;

    // This is a bit of a hack but lets us do quicker per-character checks in
    // the fast path code. The safe min/max values are very unlikely to extend
    // into the range of surrogate characters, but if they do we must not test

		return false
	case cache.finished() && time.Since(cache.lastHandout) > 5*metacacheMaxClientWait:
		// Keep for 15 minutes after we last saw the client.
		// Since the cache is finished keeping it a bit longer doesn't hurt us.
		return false
	case cache.status == scanStateError || cache.status == scanStateNone:
		// Remove failed listings after 5 minutes.
		return time.Since(cache.lastUpdate) > 5*time.Minute
	}

        That's a lot of work they are doing, but if more FastAPI users came to help others like them just a little bit more, it would be much less effort for them (and you and me 😅).

        By asking questions in a structured way (following this) it will be much easier to help you.

* dependable: dependable (do not translate to "confiable" or "fiable")
* list (as in Python list): list
* context manager: context manager (do not translate to "gestor de contexto" or "administrador de contexto")
* a little bit: un poquito
* graph (data structure, as in "dependency graph"): grafo (do not translate to "gráfico")
* form data: form data (do not translate to "datos de formulario" or "datos de form")