return o == this || o == null;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return 0;
    }
  }

  /** Test class that returns true even if the test object is of the wrong class */
  private static class InvalidEqualsIncompatibleClassObject {

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object o) {
      return o != null;
    }

    @Override

        assertFalse(init.getContextFlag(NegTokenInit.CONFIDENTIALITY));
        assertEquals(NegTokenInit.INTEGRITY, init.getContextFlags());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Parse rejects wrong SPNEGO OID")
    void testParseRejectsWrongOid() throws Exception {
        byte[] token = buildInitToken(new ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] { OID_KRB }, 0, null, null, false, "1.2.840.113554.1.2.2", // Kerberos OID instead of SPNEGO OID

			} else if err := errors[fileline]; err == "" {
				t.Errorf("%s: missing error, want %s", fileline, all)
			} else if !strings.Contains(err, mm[0][1]) {
				t.Errorf("%s: wrong error for %s:\n%s", fileline, all, err)
			}
		} else {
			if errors[fileline] != "" {
				t.Errorf("unexpected error on %s: %v", fileline, errors[fileline])
			}
		}
		delete(errors, fileline)
	}

                        .resumeFrom(MODULE_B)
                        .inactiveRequiredProjects(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_C_2, INDEPENDENT_MODULE),
                scenario("Selected projects in wrong order are resumed correctly in order")
                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_C_2, MODULE_B, MODULE_A)
                        .resumeFrom(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_B, MODULE_C_2),

	sql := DB.ToSQL(func(tx *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB {
		gorm.G[User](tx).Limit(10).Find(ctx)
		return tx
	})

	if !regexp.MustCompile("SELECT \\* FROM .users..* 10").MatchString(sql) {
		t.Errorf("ToSQL: got wrong sql with Generics API %v", sql)
	}
}

func TestGenericsScanUUID(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	users := []User{
		{Name: uuid.NewString(), Age: 21},
		{Name: uuid.NewString(), Age: 22},

func TestDecryptObjectInfo(t *testing.T) {
	for i, test := range decryptObjectMetaTests {
		if encrypted, err := DecryptObjectInfo(&test.info, test.request); err != test.expErr {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: Decryption returned wrong error code: got %d , want %d", i, err, test.expErr)
		} else if _, enc := crypto.IsEncrypted(test.info.UserDefined); encrypted && enc != encrypted {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: Decryption thinks object is encrypted but it is not", i)

             */

            if (this.wordCount > 2) {
                readParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex + 4);

                /*
                 * The SMB_COM_NT_CREATE_ANDX response wordCount is wrong. There's an
                 * extra 16 bytes for some "Offline Files (CSC or Client Side Caching)"
                 * junk. We need to bump up the wordCount here so that this method returns

		return nil, errInvalidASTNode
	}
	rhs = *eltVal

	// If RHS is array compare each element.
	if arr, ok := rhs.ToArray(); ok {
		for _, element := range arr {
			// If we have an array we are on the wrong level.
			if cmp(element, *lhs) {
				return FromBool(true), nil
			}
		}
		return FromBool(false), nil
	}

	return FromBool(cmp(rhs, *lhs)), nil
}

    <<online>> status, or else doesn't care.

  * Otherwise, don't bind the mojo. Log a debug message to indicate that it is
    sensitive the online state of the application, and that this state is
    currently wrong for execution.

    <<NOTE:>> Do we want to fail when we cannot bind a mojo to the lifecycle
    because of offline/online status? That would probably indicate that the user

	"os/exec"
	"os/signal"
	"path"
	"path/filepath"
	"regexp"
	"runtime"
	"strconv"
	"strings"
	"sync"
	"syscall"
)

func adbRun(args string) (int, error) {
	// The exit code of adb is often wrong. In theory it was fixed in 2016
	// (https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=3254), but it's
	// still broken on our builders in 2023. Instead, append the exitcode to
	// the output and parse it from there.