assertWrapsInterruptedException(expected);
    } finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */

 * instances:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If you receive them from an {@code java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService}, convert that
 *       service to a {@link ListeningExecutorService}, usually by calling {@link
 *       MoreExecutors#listeningDecorator(java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService)
 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,

  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_negative_removeUnsupported() {
    try {
      setCountNoCheckReturnValue(e3(), -1);
      fail(
          "calling setCount() with a negative count should throw "
              + "IllegalArgumentException or UnsupportedOperationException");
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException | UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
    }
  }

   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  void put(K key, V value);

  /**
   * Copies all of the mappings from the specified map to the cache. The effect of this call is
   * equivalent to that of calling {@code put(k, v)} on this map once for each mapping from key
   * {@code k} to value {@code v} in the specified map. The behavior of this operation is undefined
   * if the specified map is modified while the operation is in progress.

          "SetOpName called on already built op.");
    }
    if (op_type_.empty()) {
      return errors::FailedPrecondition(
          "GraphOperation::Reset must be called before calling SetOpName.");
    }
    // TODO(b/145674566): We use Graph::NewName to get a unique name here but
    // this may not be consistent with python's naming policy.
    mutex_lock l(g_->mu);

     */

    static final int FILE_OVERWRITE = 0x4;

    /*
     * Open the file and overwrite it's contents or create it if it does not exist
     * aka CREATE_ALWAYS (according to the wire when calling CreateFile)
     */

    static final int FILE_OVERWRITE_IF = 0x5;

    // create options
    static final int FILE_WRITE_THROUGH = 0x00000002;
    static final int FILE_SEQUENTIAL_ONLY = 0x00000004;

      }

      @Override
      public boolean remove(@CheckForNull Object o) {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
      }

      // Mostly safe: We check contains(u) before calling successors(u), so we perform unsafe
      // operations only in weird cases like checking for an EndpointPair<ArrayList> in a
      // Graph<LinkedList>.
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
      @Override

    private int crc2 = 0;
    private int crc3 = 0;

    @Override
    protected void process(ByteBuffer bb) {
      if (finished) {
        throw new IllegalStateException(
            "The behavior of calling any method after calling hash() is undefined.");
      }
      while (bb.remaining() >= 16) {
        crc0 = computeForWord(crc0);
        crc1 = computeForWord(crc1);
        crc2 = computeForWord(crc2);

   * individually submitted tasks and to collections of tasks submitted via {@code invokeAll} or
   * {@code invokeAny}. In the latter case, tasks will run serially on the calling thread. Tasks are
   * run to completion before a {@code Future} is returned to the caller (unless the executor has
   * been shutdown).
   *

        | ((source[offset + 3] & 0xFF) << 24);
  }

  /**
   * Indicates that the loading of Unsafe was successful and the load and store operations will be
   * very efficient. May be useful for calling code to fall back on an alternative implementation
   * that is slower than Unsafe.get/store but faster than the pure-Java mask-and-shift.
   */
  static boolean usingUnsafe() {