t.Errorf("Failed to set change to 55, got %v", user4.Age)
	}

	if updatedAt1.Format(time.RFC3339Nano) == user4.UpdatedAt.Format(time.RFC3339Nano) {
		t.Errorf("UpdateAt should be changed when update values with assign")
	}

	DB.Where(&User{Name: "find or create 4"}).Assign(User{Age: 44}).FirstOrCreate(&user4)
	if user4.Name != "find or create 4" || user4.ID == 0 || user4.Age != 44 {

    val requestHeaders = request.headers
    assertThat(LinkedHashSet(requestHeaders.values("D"))).isEqualTo(newSet("e", "f"))
    assertThat(LinkedHashSet(requestHeaders.values("d"))).isEqualTo(newSet("e", "f"))
    val response = getResponse(request)
    response.close()
    val recordedRequest = server.takeRequest()
    assertThat(recordedRequest.headers.values("D")).isEqualTo(listOf("e", "f"))
    assertThat(recordedRequest.headers["G"]).isNull()

            int len = testMessage.encode(buffer, 0);
            assertTrue(len >= Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle large MID values")
        void testLargeMidValue() {
            long largeMid = Long.MAX_VALUE;
            testMessage.setMid(largeMid);
            assertEquals(largeMid, testMessage.getMid());

        </field>
        <field>
          <name>checksumPolicy</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>
            What to do when verification of an artifact checksum fails. Valid values are "fail" (default for Maven 4 and
            above), "warn" (default for Maven 3) or "ignore".
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>

    suite.addTest(
        ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new UnhashableElementsImmutableListGenerator())
            .suppressing(ListHashCodeTester.getHashCodeMethod())
            .named("ImmutableList, unhashable values")
            .withFeatures(CollectionSize.ANY, ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)
            .createTestSuite());
    return suite;
  }

  // Creation tests

  public void testCreation_noArgs() {

    assertThat(response.headers("Response-Interceptor"))
      .containsExactly("Cupcake", "Donut")
    val recordedRequest = server.takeRequest()
    assertThat(recordedRequest.headers.values("Request-Interceptor"))
      .containsExactly("Android", "Bob")
  }

  @Test
  fun asyncApplicationInterceptors() {
    asyncInterceptors(false)
  }

  @Test
  fun asyncNetworkInterceptors() {

    suite.addTest(
        ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new UnhashableElementsImmutableListGenerator())
            .suppressing(ListHashCodeTester.getHashCodeMethod())
            .named("ImmutableList, unhashable values")
            .withFeatures(CollectionSize.ANY, ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)
            .createTestSuite());
    return suite;
  }

  // Creation tests

  public void testCreation_noArgs() {

      ParameterizedType parameterizedType =
          requireNonNull((ParameterizedType) subclass.getGenericSuperclass());
      for (ClassOwnership behavior : ClassOwnership.values()) {
        if (behavior.getOwnerType(LocalClass.class) == parameterizedType.getOwnerType()) {
          return behavior;
        }
      }
      throw new AssertionError();
    }
  }

  /**

    }

    /**
     * Returns a map joiner with the same behavior as this one, except automatically substituting
     * {@code nullText} for any provided null keys or values.
     */
    public MapJoiner useForNull(String nullText) {
      return new MapJoiner(joiner.useForNull(nullText), keyValueSeparator);
    }
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Rename to "toCharSequence."

  It may affect some metrics values related to the `NodeAffinity` Filter plugin. ([#114125](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/114125), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho))
- Scheduler now skips `InterPodAffinity` Filter plugin when `InterPodAffinity` Filter plugin has nothing to do with a Pod.