// Values should be the same
        assertEquals("Test Fess", value1);
        assertEquals(value1, value2);
    }

    // Test property that should be consistent
    public void test_get_propertyFilter() {
        // Test a regular property that passes through
        String value = fessConfig.get("domain.title");
        assertEquals("Test Fess", value);
    }

        // Then
        assertEquals(domain, type1.getSuppliedDomain());
        assertEquals(workstation, type1.getSuppliedWorkstation());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should generate consistent byte representation")
    void testConsistentByteRepresentation() throws IOException {
        // Given
        Type1Message type1 = new Type1Message(mockContext);

        // When

 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the set's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Set}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be

            // When
            copy.encode(buffer, startIndex);

            // Then
            // The implementation skips 4 reserved bytes without writing zeros
            // This is consistent with the actual implementation behavior
            // The reserved bytes remain as they were in the buffer
            for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {

  /**
   * Returns a view of the entries stored in this cache as a thread-safe map. Modifications made to
   * the map directly affect the cache.
   *
   * <p>Iterators from the returned map are at least <i>weakly consistent</i>: they are safe for
   * concurrent use, but if the cache is modified (including by eviction) after the iterator is
   * created, it is undefined which of the changes (if any) will be reflected in that iterator.
   *

        infoField.setAccessible(true);
        infoField.set(msrpcShareGetInfo, info502);

        // Call getSecurity multiple times - should return consistent results
        ACE[] result1 = msrpcShareGetInfo.getSecurity();
        ACE[] result2 = msrpcShareGetInfo.getSecurity();

        // Both should be null (no DACL)
        assertNull(result1);

        // But should throw when trying to use the null path
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {
            reqWithNull.size();
        });
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should write consistent structure at different offsets")
    void testWriteBytesAtDifferentOffsets() throws Exception {
        // Test at different offsets
        int[] offsets = { 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 };

	objectAPI, _ := validateAdminReq(ctx, w, r, policy.RebalanceAdminAction)
	if objectAPI == nil {
		return
	}

	// Proxy rebalance-status to first pool first node, so that users see a
	// consistent view of rebalance progress even though different rebalancing
	// pools may temporarily have out of date info on the others.
	if ep := globalEndpoints[0].Endpoints[0]; !ep.IsLocal {

    writeOrCountBytes(sink, false)
  }

  /**
   * Either writes this request to [sink] or measures its content length. We have one method do
   * double-duty to make sure the counting and content are consistent, particularly when it comes
   * to awkward operations like measuring the encoded length of header strings, or the
   * length-in-digits of an encoded integer.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)

        // Then - response is created successfully
        assertNotNull(responseWithNull);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should return consistent bytes read for valid structure")
    void testConsistentBytesRead() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // Given - 10 different valid buffers
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {