TLS (HTTPS) uses the specific port `443` by default. So that's the port we would need.

As only one process can be listening on this port, the process that would do it would be the **TLS Termination Proxy**.

            }

            length = (length << 8) + octet;
        }
        while (++octetsPos < octetsCount);

        if (length >= limit && !isParsing)   // after all we must have read at least 1 byte
        {
            throw new IOException("corrupted stream - out of bounds length found: " + length + " >= " + limit);
        }

        return length;
    }

    assertEquals(distinct, getMultiset().elementSet().size());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemove_occurrences_unsupported_absent() {
    // notice: we don't care whether it succeeds, or fails with UOE
    try {
      assertEquals(
          "multiset.remove(absent, 2) didn't return 0 or throw an exception",
          0,
          getMultiset().remove(e3(), 2));

proper Docker Image Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }}...

proper Docker Image Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }}...

    val a3 = client.newCall(newRequest("http://a/3"))
    val a4 = client.newCall(newRequest("http://a/4"))
    val t1 = makeSynchronousCall(a1)
    val t2 = makeSynchronousCall(a2)

    // We created 4 calls and started 2 of them. That's 2 running calls and 0 queued.
    ready.await()
    assertThat(dispatcher.runningCallsCount()).isEqualTo(2)
    assertThat(dispatcher.queuedCallsCount()).isEqualTo(0)

  public void testConsecutiveParentsAfterPresent() {
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./../../"));
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./.././../"));
  }

  /*
   * We co-opt some URI resolution tests for our purposes.
   * Some of the tests have queries and anchors that are a little silly here.
   */

  /** http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc2396.html#rfc.section.C.1 */

    assertThat(cache.asMap().keySet()).containsExactly(2, 4);

    CacheTesting.processPendingNotifications(cache);
    assertThat(removalListener.getCount()).isEqualTo(2);

    // Should we pepper more of these calls throughout the above? Where?
    CacheTesting.checkValidState(cache);
  }

  /**
   * Tests that when a single entry exceeds the segment's max weight, the new entry is immediately

  public void testConsecutiveParentsAfterPresent() {
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./../../"));
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./.././../"));
  }

  /*
   * We co-opt some URI resolution tests for our purposes.
   * Some of the tests have queries and anchors that are a little silly here.
   */

  /** http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc2396.html#rfc.section.C.1 */

    @Override
    public void init ( FilterConfig filterConfig ) throws ServletException {
        String name;

        Properties p = new Properties();
        /*
         * Set jcifs properties we know we want; soTimeout and cachePolicy to 30min.
         */
        p.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.soTimeout", "1800000");
        p.setProperty("jcifs.netbios.cachePolicy", "1200");
        /*