* flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage
   * relying on this, as we have made incompatible changes to serialized forms in the past and
   * expect to do so again, as discussed in https://github.com/google/guava#important-warnings.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unused")
  private static final class SerializedForm<V> implements Serializable {

    attributes:
      label: "Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?"
      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: textarea
    id: learning-curve
    attributes:
      label: "Would this change make Go easier or harder to learn, and why?"

   * comparison to determine equality of keys, which is a technical violation of the {@link Map}
   * specification, and may not be what you expect.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the key strength was already set
   * @see WeakReference
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @GwtIncompatible // java.lang.ref.WeakReference

instead must be provided via environment variables. If you have set your KMS
configuration using e.g. the `mc admin config` commands you will need to adjust
your deployment.

Even though this change is backward compatible we do not expect that it affects
the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

    void dosErrorMessagesContainsExpectedTexts() {
        // Arrange & Act
        String[] msgs = DosError.DOS_ERROR_MESSAGES;

        // Assert
        assertNotNull(msgs);
        assertTrue(msgs.length >= 3, "Expect at least the first 3 entries present");
        assertEquals("The operation completed successfully.", msgs[0]);
        assertEquals("Incorrect function.", msgs[1]);
        assertEquals("Incorrect function.", msgs[2]);
    }

A middleware doesn't have to be made for FastAPI or Starlette to work, as long as it follows the ASGI spec.

In general, ASGI middlewares are classes that expect to receive an ASGI app as the first argument.

So, in the documentation for third-party ASGI middlewares they will probably tell you to do something like:

```Python
from unicorn import UnicornMiddleware

  /** Tests that the {@link Future#get(long, TimeUnit)} method times out correctly. */
  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {
      latch.countDown();
    }

		t.Fatalf("Failed to load with joins, got error: %v", err)
	} else if len(users2) != len(users) {
		t.Fatalf("Failed to load join users, got: %v, expect: %v", len(users2), len(users))
	}

	sort.Slice(users2, func(i, j int) bool {
		return users2[i].ID > users2[j].ID
	})

	sort.Slice(users, func(i, j int) bool {
		return users[i].ID > users[j].ID
	})

    return new LinkedHashMap<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the platform preferred map implementation that preserves insertion order when used only
   * for insertions, with a hint for how many entries to expect.
   */
  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, V> preservesInsertionOrderOnPutsMapWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {
    return Maps.newLinkedHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize);
  }

   * Creates a {@code ObjectCountLinkedHashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that
   * it <i>should</i> hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty {@code ObjectCountLinkedHashMap} with enough capacity to hold {@code
   *     expectedSize} elements without resizing