//
            // If we were to cancel taskFuture, that would let the next task start while the old
            // one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the
            // callable actually completes. (We could detect completion in our wrapper
            // `AsyncCallable task`.) However, our contract also promises:

     */
    public DisniRdmaProvider() {
        // Default constructor
    }

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DisniRdmaProvider.class);

    // DiSNI components - these would be actual DiSNI objects in a real implementation
    private Object endpointGroup; // RdmaActiveEndpointGroup<DisniRdmaEndpoint>
    private Object endpoint; // RdmaActiveEndpoint
    private boolean initialized = false;

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

## Checklist:
- [ ] Fixes a regression (If yes, please add `commit-id` or `PR #` here)
- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Internal documentation updated

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

public class ExecutionError extends Error {
  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *

   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"nullness", "unchecked"})

Import `Form` from `fastapi`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[3] *}

## Define `Form` parameters { #define-form-parameters }

Create form parameters the same way you would for `Body` or `Query`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES)
  public void testReplace_absentNullKeyUnsupported() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(null, v3());
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

   * class to begin with but rather something returned from a static factory method whose declared
   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose
   * here would have no significance to end users, who would be forced to conform to the signature
   * used in FilenameFilter.)
   */
  @Override
  public boolean accept(File dir, String fileName) {
    return pattern.matcher(fileName).matches();
  }

      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for