// This function currently supports
// - SIPMOD
func sipHashMod(key string, cardinality int, id [16]byte) int {
	if cardinality <= 0 {
		return -1
	}
	// use the faster version as per siphash docs
	// https://github.com/dchest/siphash#usage
	k0, k1 := binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(id[0:8]), binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(id[8:16])
	sum64 := siphash.Hash(k0, k1, []byte(key))

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this

* `minimum_size` - Do not GZip responses that are smaller than this minimum size in bytes. Defaults to `500`.
* `compresslevel` - Used during GZip compression. It is an integer ranging from 1 to 9. Defaults to `9`. Lower value results in faster compression but larger file sizes, while higher value results in slower compression but smaller file sizes.

## Other middlewares { #other-middlewares }

There are many other ASGI middlewares.

For example:

import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoSettings;
import org.mockito.quality.Strictness;

import jcifs.BaseTest;
import jcifs.CIFSContext;
import jcifs.Configuration;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.ServerMessageBlock2;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.ServerMessageBlock2Request;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.Smb2Constants;

 * [HTTP Public Key Pinning (HPKP)][rfc_7469] or SHA-1 base64 hashes as in Chromium's
 * [static certificates][static_certificates].
 *
 * ## Setting up Certificate Pinning
 *
 * The easiest way to pin a host is turn on pinning with a broken configuration and read the
 * expected configuration when the connection fails. Be sure to do this on a trusted network, and

Import the `Response` class (sub-class) you want to use and declare it in the *path operation decorator*.

For large responses, returning a `Response` directly is much faster than returning a dictionary.

Imaginez que vous êtes l'ordinateur / le programme 🤖 dans cette histoire.

Pendant que vous faites la queue, vous être simplement inactif 😴, attendant votre tour, ne faisant rien de "productif". Mais la queue est rapide car le serveur 💁 prend seulement les commandes (et ne les prépare pas), donc tout va bien.

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.CsvSource;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;

import jcifs.BaseTest;
import jcifs.Configuration;
import jcifs.internal.SMBProtocolDecodingException;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.ServerMessageBlock2;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.ServerMessageBlock2Response;

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {