</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

 * loader as the rest of Guava, this thread would keep an indirect strong reference to the class
 * loader and prevent it from being garbage collected. This poses a problem for environments where
 * you want to throw away the class loader. For example, dynamically reloading a web application or
 * unloading an OSGi bundle.
 *

        if (e.getCause() instanceof ModelBuildingException mbe) {
            for (ModelProblem problem : mbe.getProblems()) {
                if (problem.getException() instanceof UnresolvableModelException) {
                    return problem;
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    private boolean isMissingPom(Exception e) {

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

* Fix the CPU frequency to avoid Turbo Boost from kicking in and skewing your results. On Linux you can use `cpufreq-set` and the
  `performance` CPU governor.
* Vary the problem input size with `@Param`.
* Use the integrated profilers in JMH to dig deeper if benchmark results to not match your hypotheses:

 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3

import okio.IOException

interface Callback {
  /**
   * Called when the request could not be executed due to cancellation, a connectivity problem or
   * timeout. Because networks can fail during an exchange, it is possible that the remote server
   * accepted the request before the failure.
   */
  fun onFailure(
    call: Call,
    e: IOException,
  )

        } catch (ConnectionException e) {
            logger.error("Problem disconnecting from wagon - ignoring: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    private void releaseWagon(String protocol, Wagon wagon) {
        try {
            container.release(wagon);
        } catch (ComponentLifecycleException e) {
            logger.error("Problem releasing wagon - ignoring: " + e.getMessage());
            logger.debug("", e);

name: Bug Report
description: Report a bug encountered while operating Kubernetes
labels: kind/bug
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: problem
    attributes:
      label: What happened?
      description: |
        Please provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner.
        If this matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security
    validations: