} else {
          headerValue = value
        }
      }
      name.equals("Pragma", ignoreCase = true) -> {
        // Might specify additional cache-control params. We invalidate just in case.
        canUseHeaderValue = false
      }
      else -> {
        continue@loop
      }
    }

    var pos = 0
    while (pos < value.length) {
      val tokenStart = pos

/**
 * Tests for StaticJAASConfiguration.
 *
 * Coverage goals:
 * - Happy path with default and custom options.
 * - Null/empty/ignored name parameter handling.
 * - Null options edge case.
 * - Repeated calls equivalence and instance separation.
 * - Interaction check that passed options are not mutated.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class StaticJAASConfigurationTest {

    }

    public static Artifact copyArtifact(Artifact artifact) {
        VersionRange range = artifact.getVersionRange();

        // For some reason with the introduction of MNG-1577 we have the case in Yoko where a depMan section has
        // something like the following:
        //
        // <dependencyManagement>
        //     <dependencies>
        //         <!--  Yoko modules -->

      if (value == 8) {
        iter.remove();
      }
    }
    assertIntact(q);
    assertThat(result).containsExactly(1, 15, 13, 8, 14);
  }

  /**
   * This tests a special case of the removeAt() call. Moving an element sideways on the heap could
   * break the invariants. Sometimes we need to bubble an element up instead of trickling down. See
   * implementation.
   */

following in mind:

* **JSON configuration files that contain fields with incorrect case will no longer be valid. You must correct these files before upgrading.** When specifying keys in JSON resource definitions during direct API server communication, the keys are case-sensitive. A bug introduced in Kubernetes 1.8 caused the API server to accept a request with incorrect case and coerce it to correct case, but this behaviour has been fixed in 1.11 and the API server will once again be enforcing...

# new generation
if [ "x$FESS_HEAP_NEWSIZE" != "x" ]; then
    FESS_JAVA_OPTS="$FESS_JAVA_OPTS -Xmn${FESS_HEAP_NEWSIZE}"
fi

# set to headless, just in case
FESS_JAVA_OPTS="$FESS_JAVA_OPTS -Djava.awt.headless=true"

# maximum # keep-alive connections to maintain at once
FESS_JAVA_OPTS="$FESS_JAVA_OPTS -Dhttp.maxConnections=20"

# Force the JVM to use IPv4 stack

 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one

 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #getValue} alone <i>will not</i>
 * change the behavior of {@link #equals}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you
 * should override {@code equals} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating
 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *

        Assertions.assertEquals(lastAccess, info.getLastAccessTime());
        Assertions.assertEquals(size, info.getSize());
    }

    // Supplies a range of normal and edge case values.
    private static Stream<Arguments> valueProvider() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(0, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), // all zeros
                Arguments.of(1, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), // ones

 * to the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <b>will not</b> change
 * the behaviour of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behaviour. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardOffer} method.
 *