private ExecutorService executor;
    private SmbFile base;
    private Future<List<FileNotifyInformation>> future;


    public WatchTest ( String name, Map<String, String> properties ) {
        super(name, properties);
    }


    @Parameters ( name = "{0}" )
    public static Collection<Object> configs () {
        return getConfigs("smb1", "smb2", "smb30", "smb31");
    }


    @Override
    @Before

app = FastAPI()


class Item(BaseModel):
    name: str
    description: Union[str, None] = None
    price: float
    tax: Union[float, None] = None
    tags: list[str] = []


@app.post("/items/")
async def create_item(item: Item) -> Item:
    return item


@app.get("/items/")
async def read_items() -> list[Item]:
    return [
        Item(name="Portal Gun", price=42.0),

app = FastAPI()


class Image(BaseModel):
    url: HttpUrl
    name: str


class Item(BaseModel):
    name: str
    description: str | None = None
    price: float
    tax: float | None = None
    tags: set[str] = set()
    images: list[Image] | None = None


class Offer(BaseModel):
    name: str
    description: str | None = None
    price: float
    items: list[Item]

{{- if not .Values.existingSecret }}
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: {{ template "minio.secretName" . }}
  labels:
    app: {{ template "minio.name" . }}
    chart: {{ template "minio.chart" . }}
    release: {{ .Release.Name }}
    heritage: {{ .Release.Service }}
type: Opaque
data:
  rootUser: {{ include "minio.root.username" . | b64enc | quote }}
  rootPassword: {{ include "minio.root.password" . | b64enc | quote }}

  }

  /**
   * We don't have API support for rfc822Name values (email addresses) in the subject alternative
   * name, but we don't crash either.
   */
  @Test
  fun `unsupported general name tag`() {
    val certificateByteString =
      (
        "MIIFEDCCA/igAwIBAgIRAJK4dE9xztDibHKj2NXZJbIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQA" +

    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.user.User" />

message MutatingWebhook {
  // The name of the admission webhook.
  // Name should be fully qualified, e.g., imagepolicy.kubernetes.io, where
  // "imagepolicy" is the name of the webhook, and kubernetes.io is the name
  // of the organization.
  // Required.
  optional string name = 1;

  // ClientConfig defines how to communicate with the hook.
  // Required

                                    <label for="name" class="col-sm-3 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                            key="labels.name"/></label>
                                    <div class="col-sm-9">
                                        <la:errors property="name"/>
                                        <la:text styleId="name" property="name" styleClass="form-control"/>

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

But in the end, they are implementing the same OAuth2 standard.

///

@app.get("/items/", response_model=list[Item], tags=["items"])
async def get_items():
    return [
        {"name": "Plumbus", "price": 3},
        {"name": "Portal Gun", "price": 9001},
    ]


@app.post("/users/", response_model=ResponseMessage, tags=["users"])
async def create_user(user: User):