}
                                }
                            },
                        },
                    },
                    "summary": "Read Items",
                    "operationId": "read_items_items__get",
                    "parameters": [
                        {
                            "required": False,
                            "schema": IsDict(

                                    }
                                }
                            },
                        },
                    },
                    "summary": "Read Items",
                    "operationId": "read_items_items__get",
                    "parameters": [
                        {
                            "required": False,
                            "schema": IsDict(

                                    }
                                }
                            },
                        },
                    },
                    "summary": "Read Items",
                    "operationId": "read_items_items__get",
                    "parameters": [
                        {
                            "required": False,
                            "schema": IsDict(

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.base;

import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS;

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;

/**
 * Simple benchmark: create, start, read. This does not currently report the most useful result
 * because it's ambiguous to what extent the stopwatch benchmark is being affected by GC.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
public class StopwatchBenchmark {

        } catch (final Exception e) {
            CloseableUtil.closeQuietly(fos); // for deleting file
            FileUtil.deleteInBackground(tempFile); // clean up
            throw new CrawlingAccessException("Could not read a response body: " + responseData.getUrl(), e);
        } finally {
            CloseableUtil.closeQuietly(fos);
        }
        return tempFile;
    }

                                        }
                                    }
                                },
                            },
                        },
                        "summary": "Read Items",
                        "operationId": "read_items_items__item_id__get",
                        "parameters": [
                            {
                                "required": True,

                            "description": "Successful Response",
                            "content": {"application/json": {"schema": {}}},
                        }
                    },
                    "summary": "Read Current User",
                    "operationId": "read_current_user_users_me_get",
                    "security": [{"APIKeyCookie": []}],
                }
            }
        },
        "components": {

                            "description": "Successful Response",
                            "content": {"application/json": {"schema": {}}},
                        }
                    },
                    "summary": "Read Current User",
                    "operationId": "read_current_user_users_me_get",
                    "security": [{"APIKeyQuery": []}],
                }
            }
        },
        "components": {

    assert response.json() == {
        "openapi": "3.1.0",
        "info": {"title": "FastAPI", "version": "0.1.0"},
        "paths": {
            "/items/": {
                "get": {
                    "summary": "Read Items",
                    "operationId": "read_items_items__get",
                    "responses": {
                        "200": {
                            "description": "Successful Response",

   *
   * <p>The multimap is not threadsafe when any concurrent operations update the multimap, even if
   * {@code map} and the instances generated by {@code factory} are. Concurrent read operations will
   * work correctly. To allow concurrent update operations, wrap the multimap with a call to {@link
   * #synchronizedMultimap}.
   *