import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * The concurrent hash map implementation built by {@link MapMaker}.
 *

	if err != nil {
		return
	}
	return f.headerOffset + bodyOffset, nil
}

// Open returns a [ReadCloser] that provides access to the [File]'s contents.
// Multiple files may be read concurrently.
func (f *File) Open() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
	bodyOffset, err := f.findBodyOffset()
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	if strings.HasSuffix(f.Name, "/") {

// scheduling of copies, etc. Similar to sync execution, it doesn't guarantee
// that lower level device queues (like GPU streams) have been flushed.
//
// This call may not block for execution of ops enqueued concurrently with this
// call.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TFE_ExecutorWaitForAllPendingNodes(
    TFE_Executor*, TF_Status* status);

// When an error happens, any pending operations are discarded, and newly issued

import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import java.util.function.BiFunction;

       *   I think.
       *
       * Still, if this can happen somehow (a weird filesystem implementation that lets callers
       * change its working directly concurrently with a call to deleteDirectoryContents?), it makes
       * more sense for us to fall back to a generic FileSystemException (by returning null here)
       * than to dereference parentPath and end up producing NullPointerException.

       *   I think.
       *
       * Still, if this can happen somehow (a weird filesystem implementation that lets callers
       * change its working directly concurrently with a call to deleteDirectoryContents?), it makes
       * more sense for us to fall back to a generic FileSystemException (by returning null here)
       * than to dereference parentPath and end up producing NullPointerException.

import java.net.Proxy
import java.net.ProxySelector
import java.net.Socket
import java.time.Duration
import java.util.Collections
import java.util.Random
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS
import javax.net.SocketFactory
import javax.net.ssl.HostnameVerifier
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory
import javax.net.ssl.X509TrustManager

import java.time.Duration
import java.util.Arrays
import java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch
import java.util.concurrent.Executors
import java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
import java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference
import javax.net.ssl.SSLException

		// wrote to disk - since that amounts to "copying" from a "copy"
		// instead of "copying" from source, we need the stream to be seekable
		// to ensure that we can make fan-out calls concurrently.
		buf := bytebufferpool.Get()
		defer func() {
			buf.Reset()
			bytebufferpool.Put(buf)
		}()

		md5w := md5.New()

		// Maximum allowed fan-out object size.

Concurrency
===========

This document describes the concurrency considerations for http/2 connections and the connection pool within OkHttp.

## HTTP/2 Connections

The HttpURLConnection API is a blocking API. You make a blocking write to send a request, and a blocking read to receive the response.

#### Blocking APIs