You could **call** that same function in **other places** without FastAPI, and it would **work as expected**. If there's a **required** parameter (without a default value), your **editor** will let you know with an error, **Python** will also complain if you run it without passing the required parameter.

       *
       * Android API level 10 throws ExceptionInInitializerError the first time and
       * ClassNotFoundException thereafter.
       *
       * Android API level 26 and JVM8 both let our Error propagate directly the first time and
       * throw NoClassDefFoundError thereafter. This is the proper behavior according to the spec.

          shift += 24;
          len += 3;
        } else {
          int codePoint = Character.codePointAt(input, i);
          if (codePoint == c) {
            // not a valid code point; let the JDK handle invalid Unicode
            return hashBytes(input.toString().getBytes(charset));
          }
          i++;
          buffer |= codePointToFourUtf8Bytes(codePoint) << shift;

  virtual bool IsCustomDevice(const string& device_name) = 0;

  // Register a custom device. It will return error is the device name is
  // already registered.
  // TODO(tfrt-devs): Remove this method. Let caller register it directly into
  // CustomDeviceOpHandler.
  virtual absl::Status RegisterCustomDevice(
      const string& name, std::unique_ptr<CustomDevice> device) = 0;

    if (seenExceptionsLocal == null) {
      // TODO(cpovirk): Should we use a simpler (presumably cheaper) data structure?
      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *

## Tweet about **FastAPI**

<a href="https://twitter.com/compose/tweet?text=I'm loving @fastapi because... https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi" class="external-link" target="_blank">Tweet about **FastAPI**</a> and let me and others know why you like it. 🎉

I love to hear about how **FastAPI** is being used, what you have liked in it, in which project/company are you using it, etc.

## Vote for FastAPI

              }
            })
        .start();

    // wait for the computingEntry to be created
    computationStarted.await();
    cache.invalidateAll();
    // let the computation proceed
    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

  @Synchronized private fun initUncaughtException(throwable: Throwable) {
    if (uncaughtException == null) {
      uncaughtException = throwable
    }
  }

  fun ensureAllConnectionsReleased() {
    testClient?.let {
      val connectionPool = it.connectionPool

      connectionPool.evictAll()
      if (connectionPool.connectionCount() > 0) {
        // Minimise test flakiness due to possible race conditions with connections closing.

            }
        }
    }

    private
    fun KtFile.isDocumentedAsSince(version: String, declaringClass: CtClass, field: CtField): Boolean =
        "${declaringClass.baseQualifiedKotlinName}.${field.name}".let { fqn ->
            collectDescendantsOfType<KtProperty>()
                .firstOrNull { it.fqName?.asString() == fqn }
                ?.isDocumentedAsSince(version) == true
        }

    private

your report:

  - A descriptive title
  - Your name and affiliation (if any).
  - A description of the technical details of the vulnerabilities.
  - A minimal example of the vulnerability. It is very important to let us know
    how we can reproduce your findings. For memory corruption triggerable in
    TensorFlow models, please demonstrate an exploit against one of Alphabet's
    models in <https://tfhub.dev/>