assertTrue(Iterators.all(list.iterator(), predicate));
    list.add("pants");
    assertFalse(Iterators.all(list.iterator(), predicate));
  }

  public void testFind_firstElement() {
    Iterable<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("cool", "pants");
    Iterator<String> iterator = list.iterator();
    assertEquals("cool", Iterators.find(iterator, Predicates.equalTo("cool")));
    assertEquals("pants", iterator.next());
  }

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server
    * **Starlette**: (verwendet Uvicorn) ein Web-Mikroframework

        crossinline getDeclarationsByProvider: (LLFirResolveExtensionToolDeclarationProvider) -> Sequence<D>,
    ): Sequence<S> = sequence {
        for (tool in tools) {
            for (declaration in getDeclarationsByProvider(tool.declarationProvider)) {
                val declarationName = declaration.nameAsName ?: continue
                if (!nameFilter(declarationName)) continue
                with(analysisSession) {

            String mvnName = jenkinsEnv.mvnFromVersion(buildOs, buildMvn)
            try {
                withEnv(["JAVA_HOME=${ tool "$jdkName" }",
                         "PATH+MAVEN=${ tool "$jdkName" }/bin:${tool "$mvnName"}/bin",
                         "MAVEN_OPTS=-Xms2g -Xmx4g -Djava.awt.headless=true"]) {                   

#                                                                                   ======
# The mode of Lasta Di's smart-deploy, should be cool in production (e.g. hot, cool, warm)
lasta_di.smart.deploy.mode = cool

# Is development environment here? (used for various purpose, you should set false if unknown)
development.here = false

# The title of environment (e.g. local or integration or production)

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework

     *
     * @param option the Java tools option for this path, or {@code null} if none
     */
    JavaPathType(String option) {
        this.option = option;
    }

    @Override
    public String id() {
        return name();
    }

    /**
     * Returns the name of the tool option for this path. For example, if this path type

     *
     * @return the toolchain type
     */
    String getType();

    /**
     * Gets the platform tool executable.
     *
     * @param toolName the tool platform independent tool name
     * @return file representing the tool executable, or null if the tool cannot be found
     */
    String findTool(String toolName);

    /**
     * Let the toolchain decide if it matches requirements defined

    <profile version="1.0">
      <inspection_tool class="BodyLimit" enabled="true" level="WARNING" enabled_by_default="true" />
      <inspection_tool class="GrazieCommit" enabled="true" level="TYPO" enabled_by_default="true" />
      <inspection_tool class="SubjectBodySeparation" enabled="true" level="ERROR" enabled_by_default="true" />
      <inspection_tool class="SubjectLimit" enabled="true" level="WARNING" enabled_by_default="true" />

# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
# license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

eval `{go tool dist env -9}

if(! test -x $GOTOOLDIR/dist){
	echo 'cannot find $GOTOOLDIR/dist; nothing to clean' >[1=2]
	exit noclean
}

$GOBIN/go clean -i std
$GOBIN/go tool dist clean