### EventListener.Factory

In the preceding example we used a field, `callStartNanos`, to track the elapsed time of each event. This is handy, but it won’t work if multiple calls are executing concurrently. To accommodate this, use a `Factory` to create a new `EventListener` instance for each `Call`. This allows each listener to keep call-specific state.

    author_link: https://medium.com/@krishnardt365
    link: https://medium.com/@krishnardt365/fastapi-docker-and-postgres-91943e71be92
    title: Fastapi, Docker(Docker compose) and Postgres
  German:
  - author: Marcel Sander (actidoo)
    author_link: https://www.actidoo.com
    link: https://www.actidoo.com/de/blog/python-fastapi-domain-driven-design
    title: Domain-driven Design mit Python und FastAPI
  - author: Nico Axtmann

        fail("Remove on unmodifiable iterator succeeded");
      } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Asserts that two iterators contain elements in tandem.
   *
   * <p>This test only works with iterators that iterate over a finite set.
   */
  public static void assertIteratorsInOrder(
      Iterator<?> expectedIterator, Iterator<?> actualIterator) {
    int i = 0;

    given-names: Eugene
  - family-names: Chen
    given-names: Zhifeng
  - family-names: Citro
    given-names: Craig
  - family-names: Corrado
    given-names: Greg S.
  - family-names: Davis
    given-names: Andy
  - family-names: Dean
    given-names: Jeffrey
  - family-names: Devin
    given-names: Matthieu
  - family-names: Ghemawat
    given-names: Sanjay
  - family-names: Goodfellow
    given-names: Ian

    return fromBytesNoCopy(bytes.clone());
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code HashCode} from a byte array. The array is <i>not</i> copied defensively, so it
   * must be handed-off so as to preserve the immutability contract of {@code HashCode}.
   */
  static HashCode fromBytesNoCopy(byte[] bytes) {
    return new BytesHashCode(bytes);
  }

noted that if active-active replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA` status back to source.

In the case of versioned deletes a.k.a...

        fail("Remove on unmodifiable iterator succeeded");
      } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Asserts that two iterators contain elements in tandem.
   *
   * <p>This test only works with iterators that iterate over a finite set.
   */
  public static void assertIteratorsInOrder(
      Iterator<?> expectedIterator, Iterator<?> actualIterator) {
    int i = 0;

labels.user_postOfficeBox=Postfach
labels.postOfficeBox=Postfach
labels.user_initials=Initialien
labels.initials=Initialien
labels.user_carLicense=Autokennzeichen
labels.carLicense=Autokennzeichen
labels.user_mobile=Handy
labels.mobile=Handy
labels.user_postalAddress=Postanschrift
labels.postalAddress=Postanschrift
labels.user_city=Stadt
labels.city=Stadt
labels.user_teletexTerminalIdentifier=Teletex-Endgerätkennung

      <email>******@****.***</email>
      <roles>
        <role>Developer</role>
      </roles>
    </developer>
    <developer>
      <name>Andrew Williams</name>
      <id>handyande</id>
      <email>andy@handyande.co.uk</email>
      <roles>
        <role>Developer</role>
      </roles>
    </developer>
  </developers>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>

      <email>******@****.***</email>
      <roles>
        <role>Developer</role>
      </roles>
    </developer>
    <developer>
      <name>Andrew Williams</name>
      <id>handyande</id>
      <email>andy@handyande.co.uk</email>
      <roles>
        <role>Developer</role>
      </roles>
    </developer>
    <developer>
      <name>Rahul Thakur</name>
      <id>rahul</id>