import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator;
import static java.lang.Math.max;
import static java.lang.Thread.State.WAITING;
import static java.util.concurrent.Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MINUTES;

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator;
import static java.lang.Math.max;
import static java.lang.Thread.State.WAITING;
import static java.util.concurrent.Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MINUTES;

    This is the dataset that powers `HttpUrl.topPrivateDomain()`.

 *  Fix: Immediately update the connection's flow control window instead of waiting for the
    receiving stream to process it.

    This change may increase OkHttp's memory use for applications that make many concurrent HTTP

### 5.3 File Handle Integration
```java
// In SmbFile.java
@Override
protected void handleConnectionLoss(IOException error) {
    if (tree.getSession().isWitnessEnabled()) {
        log.info("Connection lost, waiting for witness notification before retry");
        
        // Wait briefly for witness notification before retrying
        try {
            Thread.sleep(2000);  // 2 second grace period

    val startNanos = System.nanoTime()
    sink.write(Buffer().writeUtf8("f"), 1)
    assertFailsWith<InterruptedIOException> {
      sink.flush() // This will time out waiting on the write window.
    }
    val elapsedNanos = System.nanoTime() - startNanos
    awaitWatchdogIdle()
    // 200ms delta
    assertThat(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(elapsedNanos).toDouble())

 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Neither thread will progress because each is waiting for the other. In more complex
 * applications, cycles can arise from interactions among more than 2 locks:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockC)
 * ...

    * !!! [1215 15:42:56] Timed out waiting for apiserver:  to answer at https://localhost:6443/version; tried 10 waiting 1 between each

- Kubelet: improve the performance when waiting for a synchronization of the node list with the kube-apiserver ([#99336](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/99336), [@neolit123](https://github.com/neolit123)) [SIG Node]

## Dependencies

### Added

    * When a pod is deleted, the controller waits for the volume to be safely unmounted by kubelet. It does this by waiting for the volume to no longer be present in the nodes Node.Status.VolumesInUse list. If the volume is not safely unmounted by kubelet within a pre-configured duration (3 minutes in Kubernetes v1.3), the controller unilaterally detaches the volume (this...

    }

    /**
     * Creates and returns a new instance of {@link SynchronousQueue}.
     *
     * @param <E> the element type of {@link SynchronousQueue}
     * @param fair whether the access order is FIFO for waiting threads
     * @return a new instance of {@link SynchronousQueue}
     * @see SynchronousQueue#SynchronousQueue()
     */
    public static <E> SynchronousQueue<E> newSynchronousQueue(final boolean fair) {