reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Floats.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(float[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

// call Recycle() when the object is no longer needed.
// The recycler should handle nil pointers.
type Recycler interface {
	Recycle()
}

// MSS is a map[string]string that can be serialized.
// It is not very efficient, but it is only used for easy parameter passing.
type MSS map[string]string

// Get returns the value for the given key.
func (m *MSS) Get(key string) string {
	if m == nil {
		return ""
	}
	return (*m)[key]

 * Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)}, which provides the same implementation with an interface
 * tailored to that use case.
 *
 * <p>This uses the same efficient implementation as {@link Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)},
 * offering expected O(n + k log k) performance (worst case O(n log k)) for n calls to {@link

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

                }
            }
            return buf.toString();
        }
    }

    public ArtifactVersion matchVersion(List<ArtifactVersion> versions) {
        // TODO could be more efficient by sorting the list and then moving along the restrictions in order?

        ArtifactVersion matched = null;
        for (ArtifactVersion version : versions) {
            if (containsVersion(version)) {

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Longs.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(long[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Longs.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(long[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

 *     .url("http://publicobject.com/helloworld.txt")
 *     .build();
 * ```
 *
 * If it is only necessary to force a cached response to be validated by the server, use the more
 * efficient `max-age=0` directive instead:
 *
 * ```java
 * Request request = new Request.Builder()
 *     .cacheControl(new CacheControl.Builder()
 *         .maxAge(0, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
 *         .build())