world, because the Go garbage collector is unaware of the memory
allocated by C.  The most important consideration is not to
constrain future implementations, so the rule is that Go code can
hand a Go pointer to C code but must separately arrange for
Go to hang on to a reference to the pointer until C is done with it.
*/
package gmp

/*
#cgo LDFLAGS: -lgmp
#include <gmp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

        DcerpcHandle handle = mock(DcerpcHandle.class);
        LsaPolicyHandle policy = mock(LsaPolicyHandle.class);

        jcifs.SID[] sids = new jcifs.SID[] { sid("S-1-1-0") };

        // Arrange a minimal response with given retval
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            jcifs.dcerpc.msrpc.MsrpcLookupSids rpc = inv.getArgument(0);
            rpc.retval = ret;
            // Provide empty arrays to satisfy code paths

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("searchSessionKey returns null when Subject has no tickets")
    void searchSessionKey_emptySubject() throws Exception {
        // Arrange GSS context so method can run without NPE
        GSSName src = mock(GSSName.class);
        GSSName targ = mock(GSSName.class);
        when(src.export()).thenReturn(buildExportName(new Oid("1.2.3"), "client"));

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

publicly available network server or other readily accessible means,
then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so
available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the
patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner
consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent
license to downstream recipients.  "Knowingly relying" means you have

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>All assertions in code running in generated threads must use the forms {@link #threadFail},

        if (cancelled) {
          // Unless it is cancelled, the delegate may continue being scheduled
          scheduledDelegate.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);

          /*
           * We'd love to also arrange for the inverse -- that is, to also automatically cancel this
           * future if scheduledDelegate is cancelled (as happens after the delegate executor is

<code>R15</code> points to the stack frame and should typically only be accessed using the
virtual registers <code>SP</code> and <code>FP</code>.
</p>

<p>
Load- and store-multiple instructions operate on a range of registers.
The range of registers is specified by a start register and an end register.
For example, <code>LMG</code> <code>(R9),</code> <code>R5,</code> <code>R7</code> would load