Code snippet'lerde string literal için zor bir örnek: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Bilgi

... Ancak code snippet'lerin içindeki tırnaklar olduğu gibi kalmalıdır.

////

## Code block'lar { #code-blocks }

Складний приклад строкових літералів у фрагментах коду: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Хардкор: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Інформація

... Однак лапки всередині фрагментів коду мають залишатися як є.

////

## Блоки коду { #code-blocks }

Ein schwieriges Beispiel für Stringliterale in Codeschnipseln: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Info

... Allerdings müssen Anführungszeichen in Codeschnipseln unverändert bleiben.

////

          }
        });
  }

  /**
   * An immutable snapshot of the current state of the service. This class represents a consistent
   * snapshot of the state and therefore it can be used to answer simple queries without needing to
   * grab a lock.
   */
  // @Immutable except that Throwable is mutable (initCause(), setStackTrace(), mutable subclasses).
  private static final class StateSnapshot {
    /**

    }

    Ordering<Object> arbitrary = Ordering.arbitrary();
    sort(list, arbitrary);

    // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that
    // comparing any pair of elements gives the answer we expect.
    testComparator(arbitrary, list);

    assertThat(arbitrary.toString()).isEqualTo("Ordering.arbitrary()");
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // ArbitraryOrdering

    }

    Ordering<Object> arbitrary = Ordering.arbitrary();
    sort(list, arbitrary);

    // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that
    // comparing any pair of elements gives the answer we expect.
    testComparator(arbitrary, list);

    assertThat(arbitrary.toString()).isEqualTo("Ordering.arbitrary()");
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // ArbitraryOrdering

     * 10^floor(log10(x)).
     */

    if (approxCmp > 0) {
      /*
       * The code is written so that even completely incorrect approximations will still yield the
       * correct answer eventually, but in practice this branch should almost never be entered, and
       * even then the loop should not run more than once.
       */
      do {
        approxLog10--;

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[13,18] *}

Obwohl Sie `Depends` in den Parametern Ihrer Funktion genauso verwenden wie `Body`, `Query`, usw., funktioniert `Depends` etwas anders.

Sie übergeben `Depends` nur einen einzigen Parameter.

Dieser Parameter muss so etwas wie eine Funktion sein.

代码片段中的字符串字面量示例：`"this"`，`'that'`。

一个较难的字符串字面量示例：`f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

硬核：`Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | 信息

... 但是，代码片段内的引号必须保持不变。

////

## 代码块 { #code-blocks }

//// tab | 测试

一个 Bash 代码示例...

Un ejemplo difícil de literales de string en fragmentos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Info

... Sin embargo, las comillas dentro de fragmentos de código deben quedarse tal cual.

////