}
  }

  private static void checkResults(List<Future<String>> futures)
      throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
    for (int i = 0; i < futures.size(); i++) {
      assertEquals(RESULT_VALUE + i, futures.get(i).get());
    }
  }

  private static List<Callable<String>> createTasks(int n) {
    List<Callable<String>> callables = Lists.newArrayList();

   *
   * <p>Note: this method is idempotent and safe to call from any thread
   */
  public void dispatch() {
    // iterate by index to avoid concurrent modification exceptions
    for (int i = 0; i < listeners.size(); i++) {
      listeners.get(i).dispatch();
    }
  }

  /**
   * A special purpose queue/executor that dispatches listener events serially on a configured

  public void testRemovePresent() {
    assertTrue(multimap().remove(k0(), v0()));

    assertFalse(multimap().containsEntry(k0(), v0()));
    expectMissing(e0());
    assertEquals(getNumElements() - 1, multimap().size());
    assertGet(k0(), ImmutableList.<V>of());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @MapFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_REMOVE, ALLOWS_NULL_KEYS})
  public void testRemoveNullKeyPresent() {

   * value} before proceeding with the {@link #put} operation. If the bimap previously contained the
   * provided key-value mapping, this method has no effect.
   *
   * <p>Note that a successful call to this method could cause the size of the bimap to increase by
   * one, stay the same, or even decrease by one.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> If an existing entry with this value is removed, the key for that entry is
   * discarded and not returned.
   *

  public void testRemovePresent() {
    assertTrue(multimap().remove(k0(), v0()));

    assertFalse(multimap().containsEntry(k0(), v0()));
    expectMissing(e0());
    assertEquals(getNumElements() - 1, multimap().size());
    assertGet(k0(), ImmutableList.<V>of());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @MapFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_REMOVE, ALLOWS_NULL_KEYS})
  public void testRemoveNullKeyPresent() {

    // GWT's ConcurrentHashMap is a wrapper around HashMap, but it rejects null keys, which matches
    // the behaviour of the non-GWT implementation of newConcurrentHashSet().
    // On the other hand HashSet might be better for code size if apps aren't
    // already using Collections.newSetFromMap and ConcurrentHashMap.
    return Collections.newSetFromMap(new ConcurrentHashMap<E, Boolean>());
  }

      this.multiset = multiset;
      this.keys = keys;
    }

    @Override
    public int[] call() throws Exception {
      int iterations = 100000;
      int nKeys = keys.size();
      int[] deltas = new int[nKeys];
      Operation[] operations = Operation.values();
      for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
        int keyIndex = random.nextInt(nKeys);

 *       in the hash code should be as evenly "spread out" through the hash code's bits as possible.
 *       The result is that, for example, when choosing a bucket in a hash table of size 2^8,
 *       <i>any</i> eight bits could be consistently used.
 *   <li><b>cryptographic:</b> certain hash functions such as {@link Hashing#sha512} are designed to

 *       in the hash code should be as evenly "spread out" through the hash code's bits as possible.
 *       The result is that, for example, when choosing a bucket in a hash table of size 2^8,
 *       <i>any</i> eight bits could be consistently used.
 *   <li><b>cryptographic:</b> certain hash functions such as {@link Hashing#sha512} are designed to

		<%-- Side Content --%>
		<c:if test="${facetResponse != null}">
			<c:forEach var="fieldData" items="${facetResponse.fieldList}">
				<c:if
					test="${fieldData.name == 'label' && fieldData.valueCountMap.size() > 0}">
					<ul class="list-group mb-2">
						<li class="list-group-item text-uppercase"><la:message
								key="labels.facet_label_title" /></li>
						<c:forEach var="countEntry" items="${fieldData.valueCountMap}">