* array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *
   * @param c the collection for which to return an array of elements
   */

// preferReaders can mark readers as preferred.
// These will be chosen before others.
func (p *parallelReader) preferReaders(prefer []bool) {
	if len(prefer) != len(p.orgReaders) {
		return
	}
	// Copy so we don't change our input.
	tmp := make([]io.ReaderAt, len(p.orgReaders))
	copy(tmp, p.orgReaders)
	p.readers = tmp
	// next is the next non-preferred index.
	next := 0
	for i, ok := range prefer {
		if !ok || p.readers[i] == nil {

# ----------------------------------------------------------
# Application Exception
# ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure = Anmeldung fehlgeschlagen.
errors.app.illegal.transition = Ungültiger Übergang. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

   * processing and may run concurrently, for example, if the JVM flag {@code
   * -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent} is used.
   *
   * <p>Whenever possible, it is preferable to test directly for some observable change resulting
   * from GC, as with {@link #awaitClear}. Because there are no guarantees for the order of GC
   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.

     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.
     * --- System.out.println(input + " " + simplifyPath(input));
     * --- fail(). (If the test were to pass, its output would be hidden.)
     * - Run the test.

    assertThat(min(2, 1, reverse)).isEqualTo(2);
    assertThat(max(1, 2, reverse)).isEqualTo(1);
    assertThat(max(2, 1, reverse)).isEqualTo(1);
  }

  /**
   * Fails compilation if the signature of min and max is changed to take {@code Comparator<T>}
   * instead of {@code Comparator<? super T>}.
   */
  public void testMinMaxWithSupertypeComparator() {
    Comparator<Number> numberComparator = comparing(Number::intValue);

    return normalizeWord(word);
  }

  private static String firstCharOnlyToUpper(String word) {
    return word.isEmpty()
        ? word
        : Ascii.toUpperCase(word.charAt(0)) + Ascii.toLowerCase(word.substring(1));
  }

    // read char by char
    CharSequenceReader reader = new CharSequenceReader(charSequence);
    for (int i = 0; i < expected.length(); i++) {
      assertEquals(expected.charAt(i), reader.read());
    }
    assertFullyRead(reader);

    // read all to one array
    reader = new CharSequenceReader(charSequence);
    char[] buf = new char[expected.length()];

   capacity and competence.

 * **Be considerate**: People use our work, and we depend on the work of others. Consider users and
   colleagues before taking action. For example, changes to code, infrastructure, policy, and
   documentation may negatively impact others.

 * **Be respectful**: We expect people to work together to resolve conflict, assume good intentions,

   */
  protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

  /**
   * Run the service. This method is invoked on the execution thread. Implementations must respond
   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work
   *     }
   *   }
   * </pre>
   *