import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a public API (public class, method or field) is subject to incompatible changes,
 * or even removal, in a future release. An API bearing this annotation is exempt from any
 * compatibility guarantees made by its containing library. Note that the presence of this

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

) : DelegatingSocketFactory(getDefault()) {
  private val hostMapping = mutableMapOf<InetAddress, InetSocketAddress>()

  /** Sets the [real] address for [requested].  */
  operator fun set(
    requested: InetAddress,
    real: InetSocketAddress,
  ) {
    hostMapping[requested] = real
  }

  override fun createSocket(): Socket =
    object : Socket() {
      override fun connect(
        endpoint: SocketAddress?,

  /**
   * Returns a map view that associates each key with the corresponding values in the multimap.
   * Changes to the returned map, such as element removal, will update the underlying multimap. The
   * map does not support {@code setValue()} on its entries, {@code put}, or {@code putAll}.
   *

     */
    SHARE_MOVE(3),

    /**
     * IP address changed - network configuration change
     */
    IP_CHANGE(4),

    /**
     * Share deleted - share removal notification
     */
    SHARE_DELETE(5),

    /**
     * Cluster node unavailable - node down event
     */
    NODE_UNAVAILABLE(6),

    /**
     * Cluster node available - node up event
     */

            var dependencyElements = dependencies.children("dependency").toList();
            assertEquals(1, dependencyElements.size(), "Should have only one dependency after duplicate removal");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("should remove duplicate dependencies in regular dependencies")
        void shouldRemoveDuplicateDependenciesInRegularDependencies() throws Exception {

        }
    }

    @Override
    protected int generateLocalKey() {
        // In real implementation, this would get the local key from DiSNI:
        // return memoryRegister.getLkey();
        return keyGenerator.getAndIncrement();
    }

    @Override
    protected int generateRemoteKey() {
        // In real implementation, this would get the remote key from DiSNI:
        // return memoryRegister.getRkey();

        // Default constructor
    }

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DisniRdmaProvider.class);

    // DiSNI components - these would be actual DiSNI objects in a real implementation
    private Object endpointGroup; // RdmaActiveEndpointGroup<DisniRdmaEndpoint>
    private Object endpoint; // RdmaActiveEndpoint
    private boolean initialized = false;

    @Override

  GENERAL_PURPOSE(
      CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE,
      SUPPORTS_SET,
      SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX,
      SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX),

  /** Features supported by lists where only removal is allowed. */
  REMOVE_OPERATIONS(CollectionFeature.REMOVE_OPERATIONS, SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX);

  private final Set<Feature<? super List>> implied;

  ListFeature(Feature<? super List>... implied) {

                <arg>--add-reads=com.google.common.testlib=ALL-UNNAMED</arg>
                <!-- https://errorprone.info/docs/installation#maven -->
                <arg>-XDcompilePolicy=simple</arg>
                <arg>-Xlint:-removal</arg>
                <arg>-Xlint:-options</arg>
              </compilerArgs>
              <multiReleaseOutput>true</multiReleaseOutput>
            </configuration>
          </execution>
        </executions>