if objectSize > maxMultipartPutObjectSize {
		err = errors.New("entity too large")
		return
	}

	configuredPartSize := minPartSize
	// Use floats for part size for all calculations to avoid
	// overflows during float64 to int64 conversions.
	partSizeFlt := float64(objectSize / maxPartsCount)
	partSizeFlt = math.Ceil(partSizeFlt/float64(configuredPartSize)) * float64(configuredPartSize)

	// Part size.

        byte[] buf = bufferQueue.poll();
        if (buf != null) {
            queueSize.decrementAndGet();
            return buf;
        }

        // Validate buffer size to prevent overflow
        int bufferSize = SmbComTransaction.TRANSACTION_BUF_SIZE;
        if (bufferSize < 0 || bufferSize > MAX_BUFFER_SIZE) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("Invalid buffer size: " + bufferSize);
        }

            // Validate that security buffer doesn't exceed available data
            if (hdrStart + securityBufferOffset < hdrStart || // Check for integer overflow
                    hdrStart + securityBufferOffset + securityBufferLength < 0 || // Check for integer overflow
                    hdrStart + securityBufferOffset + securityBufferLength > buffer.length) {

  // Verify that StackOverflowError in a long chain of SetFuture doesn't cause the entire toString
  // call to fail
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
  @AndroidIncompatible // b/391667564: crashes from stack overflows
  public void testSetFutureToString_stackOverflow() {
    SettableFuture<String> orig = SettableFuture.create();
    SettableFuture<String> prev = orig;
    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {

   * ok if it's in a method call. If the index passed in is 0 then no copying will be done.
   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it
      throw new AssertionError("Cannot increase internal buffer any further");
    }
    char[] copy = new char[size];
    if (index > 0) {

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

    }

    public void test_intervalRule_isTarget_dayOverflow() {
        IntervalRule rule = new IntervalRule("10:00", "18:00", "1", 1000); // Sunday only

        // Test day overflow (day 8 should be treated as day 1)
        // For same-day rules, it should check the day directly
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(12, 30, 8)); // Should be treated as day 1 (Sunday)

   * thrown by {@linkplain MoreExecutors#directExecutor direct execution}) will be caught and
   * logged.
   *
   * <p>Note: If your listener is lightweight -- and will not cause stack overflow by completing
   * more futures or adding more {@code directExecutor()} listeners inline -- consider {@link
   * MoreExecutors#directExecutor}. Otherwise, avoid it: See the warnings on the docs for {@code
   * directExecutor}.