'BODY':\n      return element.ownerDocument.body\n    case '#document':\n      return element.body\n  }\n\n  // Firefox want us to check `-x` and `-y` variations as well\n  const { overflow, overflowX, overflowY } = getStyleComputedProperty(element);\n  if (/(auto|scroll|overlay)/.test(overflow + overflowY + overflowX)) {\n    return element;\n  }\n\n  return getScrollParent(getParentNode(element));\n}\n","/**\n * Returns the reference node of the reference object, or the reference object itself.\n...

  // TODO(lowasser): consider overhauling this back to Map<E, Integer>
  private transient Map<E, Count> backingMap;

  /*
   * Cache the size for efficiency. Using a long lets us avoid the need for
   * overflow checking and ensures that size() will function correctly even if
   * the multiset had once been larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE.
   */
  private transient long size;

  /** Standard constructor. */

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

    accumulator.add(ONE_VALUE, OTHER_ONE_VALUE);
    for (int power = 1; power < Long.SIZE - 1; power++) {
      accumulator.addAll(accumulator.snapshot());
    }
    // Should overflow without throwing.
    accumulator.addAll(accumulator.snapshot());
    assertThat(accumulator.count()).isLessThan(0L);
  }

  public void testXStats() {

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~