This is "synchronous" work, you are "synchronized" with the cashier/cook 👨‍🍳. You have to wait 🕙 and be there at the exact moment that the cashier/cook 👨‍🍳 finishes the burgers and gives them to you, or otherwise, someone else might take them.

<img src="/img/async/parallel-burgers/parallel-burgers-04.png" class="illustration">

Then your cashier/cook 👨‍🍳 finally comes back with your burgers, after a long time waiting 🕙 there in front of the counter.

And to communicate using WebSockets with your backend you would probably use your frontend's utilities.

Or you might have a native mobile application that communicates with your WebSocket backend directly, in native code.

Or you might have any other way to communicate with the WebSocket endpoint.

---

   * stream is longer, its extra elements will be ignored.
   *
   * <p>Note that if you are calling {@link Stream#forEach} on the resulting stream, you might want
   * to consider using {@link #forEachPair} instead of this method.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> The resulting stream is not <a

    if (supportsRemove) {
      // We use a copy of "entryToRemove" in the assertion because "entryToRemove" might be
      // invalidated and have undefined behavior after entrySet.removeAll(entriesToRemove),
      // for example entryToRemove.getValue() might be null.
      Entry<K, V> entryToRemoveCopy = mapEntry(entryToRemove.getKey(), entryToRemove.getValue());

      int initialSize = map.size();

 * <strong>not</strong> equal to {@code key2}, it is <strong>not</strong> guaranteed that {@code
 * striped.get(key1) != striped.get(key2)}; the elements might nevertheless be mapped to the same
 * lock. The lower the number of stripes, the higher the probability of this happening.
 *
 * <p>There are three flavors of this class: {@code Striped<Lock>}, {@code Striped<Semaphore>}, and

        throw new AssertionError("malformed class path entry: " + entry, e);
      }
    }
    return urls.build();
  }

  /**
   * These tests fail in JDK 9 and JDK 10 for an unknown reason. It might be the test; it might be
   * the underlying functionality. Fixing this is not a high priority; if you need it to be fixed,
   * please comment on <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3086">issue 3086</a>.
   */

    this.iterator = iterator;
  }

  @Override
  public Iterator<E> iterator() {
    if (iterator == null) {
      // TODO: throw something else? Do we worry that people's code and tests
      // might be relying on this particular type of exception?
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }
    try {
      return iterator;
    } finally {
      iterator = null;
    }
  }

  // http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/security/crypto/CryptoSpec.html
  //  - Some providers may choose to also include alias names.
  //  - For example, the "SHA-1" algorithm might be referred to as "SHA1".
  //  - The algorithm name is not case-sensitive.
  private static final ImmutableMap<String, HashFunction> ALGORITHMS =
      new ImmutableMap.Builder<String, HashFunction>()

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/query-param-models/image01.png">
</div>

## Forbid Extra Query Parameters

In some special use cases (probably not very common), you might want to **restrict** the query parameters that you want to receive.

You can use Pydantic's model configuration to `forbid` any `extra` fields:

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python hl_lines="10"

  private static final int MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS = 1000;

  @Override
  public final void run() {
    /*
     * Set runner thread before checking isDone(). If we were to check isDone() first, the task
     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,
     * allowing the CAS below to succeed.
     */