}
      // The interface could be package-private or private.
      // filter out equals/hashCode/toString
      if (method.getName().equals("equals")
          && method.getParameterTypes().length == 1
          && method.getParameterTypes()[0] == Object.class) {
        continue;
      }
      if (method.getName().equals("hashCode") && method.getParameterTypes().length == 0) {
        continue;
      }

   * double the index of the entry in entrySet.asList.)
   *
   * The basic data structure is described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_addressing.
   * The pointer to a key is stored in hashTable[Hashing.smear(key.hashCode()) % table.length],
   * save that if that location is already full, we try the next index, and the next, until we
   * find an empty table position.  Since the table has a power-of-two size, we use

    sink.putByte((byte) 7);
    sink.putBytes(new byte[] {});
    sink.putBytes(new byte[] {8});
    HashCode unused = sink.hash();
    sink.assertInvariants(8);
    sink.assertBytes(expected);
  }

  public void testShort() {
    Sink sink = new Sink(4);
    sink.putShort((short) 0x0201);
    HashCode unused = sink.hash();
    sink.assertInvariants(2);
    sink.assertBytes(new byte[] {1, 2, 0, 0}); // padded with zeros

  public abstract boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object obj);

  /**
   * The hashcode of an ordered {@link EndpointPair} is equal to {@code Objects.hashCode(source(),
   * target())}. The hashcode of an unordered {@link EndpointPair} is equal to {@code
   * nodeU().hashCode() + nodeV().hashCode()}.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  private static final class Ordered<N> extends EndpointPair<N> {

      dummy += Objects.hashCode(S0, S1, S2, S3);
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  @Benchmark
  int hashString_5(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      dummy += Objects.hashCode(S0, S1, S2, S3, S4);
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  @Benchmark
  int hashMixed_5(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      dummy += Objects.hashCode(I2, S1, D1, S2, I0);

  private final ImmutableTable<Character, Integer, String> testTable =
      new SingletonImmutableTable<>('a', 1, "blah");

  public void testHashCode() {
    assertEquals(Objects.hashCode('a', 1, "blah"), testTable.hashCode());
  }

  public void testCellSet() {
    assertEquals(ImmutableSet.of(immutableCell('a', 1, "blah")), testTable.cellSet());
  }

  public void testColumn() {

      HashCode hashcode1 = hashFunction.hashInt(value);
      HashCode hashcode2 = hashFunction.hashInt(value);
      Assert.assertEquals(hashcode1, hashcode2); // idempotent
      Assert.assertEquals(hashFunction.bits(), hashcode1.bits());
      Assert.assertEquals(hashFunction.bits(), hashcode1.asBytes().length * 8);
      hashcodes.add(hashcode1);
    }

 *
 * <h3>Relationship to {@link Object#hashCode}</h3>
 *
 * <p>Java's baked-in concept of hash codes is constrained to 32 bits, and provides no separation
 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because

 *
 * <h3>Relationship to {@link Object#hashCode}</h3>
 *
 * <p>Java's baked-in concept of hash codes is constrained to 32 bits, and provides no separation
 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because

  }

  public void testHashCode() {
    assertEquals(control("foo", 1).hashCode(), entry("foo", 1).hashCode());
    assertEquals(control("bar", 2).hashCode(), entry("bar", 2).hashCode());
  }

  public void testHashCodeNull() {
    assertEquals(control(NE, 1).hashCode(), entry(NE, 1).hashCode());
  }

  public void testNegativeCount() {