}

    @Test
    void testNoCliOptionsDoesNotSetSystemProperty() {
        // Simulate the scenario where no CLI options are specified
        // This should NOT call setRootLoggerLevel, allowing configuration file to take effect

        MockInvokerRequest invokerRequest = new MockInvokerRequest(false); // not verbose
        MockOptions options = new MockOptions(false); // not quiet

            // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
            snapshot.setTimestamp(getDeploymentTimestamp());

            // we update the build number anyway so that it doesn't get lost. It requires the timestamp to take effect
            try {
                int buildNumber = resolveLatestSnapshotBuildNumber(artifact, localRepository, remoteRepository);

                snapshot.setBuildNumber(buildNumber + 1);

</blockquote>

## Investigation { #investigation }

By using all the previous alternatives I had the chance to learn from all of them, take ideas, and combine them in the best way I could find for myself and the teams of developers I have worked with.

For example, it was clear that ideally it should be based on standard Python type hints.

                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_B)
                        .resumeFrom(MODULE_C_2)
                        .makeBehavior(REACTOR_MAKE_DOWNSTREAM)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_C_2),
                scenario("Excluding an also make dependency from selectedProject does take its transitive dependency")

// It should never be used directly since buckets are
// distributed deterministically.
// Therefore no cluster locks are required.
var localMetacacheMgr = &metacacheManager{
	buckets: make(map[string]*bucketMetacache),
	trash:   make(map[string]metacache),
}

type metacacheManager struct {
	mu      sync.RWMutex
	init    sync.Once
	buckets map[string]*bucketMetacache
	trash   map[string]metacache // Recently deleted lists.

    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration, but
    // it's all encapsulated here so it appears normalized to the POM builder.

    // We are going to take the project packaging and find all plugins in the default lifecycle and create
    // fully populated Plugin objects, including executions with goals and default configuration taken
    // from the plugin.xml inside a plugin.

        }
      }

    // Make the first request waiting until we get our auth challenge.
    val request = Request(server.url("/"))
    blockingAuthClient.newCall(request).enqueue(callback)
    val response1 = responses.take()
    assertThat(response1).isEqualTo("")
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)

        for (ExecutionPlanItem executionPlanItem : mavenExecutionPlan) {
            result.add(executionPlanItem.getMojoExecution());
        }
        return result;
    }

    // We need to take in multiple lifecycles
    @Test
    public void testCalculationOfBuildPlanTasksOfTheCleanLifecycleAndTheInstallLifecycle() throws Exception {
        File pom = getProject("project-with-additional-lifecycle-elements");

	// Listen Publisher and peer-listen-client uses nonblocking send and hence does not wait for slow receivers.
	// Use buffered channel to take care of burst sends or slow w.Write()
	mergeCh := make(chan []byte, globalAPIConfig.getRequestsPoolCapacity()*len(globalEndpoints.Hostnames()))
	localCh := make(chan event.Event, globalAPIConfig.getRequestsPoolCapacity())

	// Convert local messages to JSON and send to mergeCh
	go func() {

    val timeout: Int = 180,
    val maxParallelForks: Int = 4,
) {
    // Include cross version tests, these take care of selecting a very small set of versions to cover when run as part of this stage, including the current version
    QUICK(true, true, true, 120, 4),

    // Include cross version tests, these take care of selecting a very small set of versions to cover when run as part of this stage, including the current version