* java.util.regex} library, but an alternate implementation can be supplied using the {@link
 * java.util.ServiceLoader} mechanism.
 */
@GwtIncompatible
interface PatternCompiler {
  /**
   * Compiles the given pattern.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the pattern is invalid
   */
  @RestrictedApi(
      explanation = "PatternCompiler is an implementation detail of com.google.common.base",

 * java.util.regex} library, but an alternate implementation can be supplied using the {@link
 * java.util.ServiceLoader} mechanism.
 */
@GwtIncompatible
interface PatternCompiler {
  /**
   * Compiles the given pattern.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the pattern is invalid
   */
  @RestrictedApi(
      explanation = "PatternCompiler is an implementation detail of com.google.common.base",

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Implementation Tests")
    class ImplementationTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Test concrete implementation of FileNotifyInformation")
        void testConcreteImplementation() {
            // Create a simple implementation for testing
            FileNotifyInformation impl = new FileNotifyInformation() {

    }

    /**
     * Test multiple FileInformation implementations can coexist
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test multiple FileInformation implementations")
    void testMultipleFileInformationImplementations() {
        // Create different mock implementations
        FileInformation basicInfo = mock(FileInformation.class);

 * override {@code offer} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardOffer} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code
 * default} methods. Instead, it inherits their default implementations. When those implementations
 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingQueue}.
 *

 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision

 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision

}

group = "gradlebuild"

description = "Provides a plugin for publishing some of Gradle's subprojects to Artifactory or the Plugin Portal"

dependencies {
    implementation(projects.basics)
    implementation(projects.moduleIdentity)

    implementation("com.gradle.publish:plugin-publish-plugin")

@GwtCompatible
final class Platform {

  /** Returns the platform preferred implementation of a map based on a hash table. */
  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, V> newHashMapWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {
    return Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the platform preferred implementation of an insertion ordered map based on a hash
   * table.
   */

   * any {@code Entry} instances already retrieved from the entry set (this is
   * implementation-dependent). Furthermore, implementations are not required to support
   * modifications to the entry set at all, and the {@code Entry} instances themselves don't even
   * have methods for modification. See the specific implementation class for more details on how
   * its entry set handles modifications.
   *