/**
   * Start the service.
   *
   * <p>By default this method does nothing.
   */
  protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

  /**
   * Stop the service. This is guaranteed not to run concurrently with {@link #runOneIteration}.
   *
   * <p>By default this method does nothing.
   */
  protected void shutDown() throws Exception {}

  /**

			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with error \"%s\", but passed instead.", i, instanceType, testCase.expectedError.Error())
			continue
		}
		// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
		if actualErr != nil && actualErr != testCase.expectedError {

            assertTrue("Exception message should mention 'null'", message.toLowerCase().contains("null"));
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test that validateInputStream does not modify or consume the stream.
     */
    public void test_validateInputStream_doesNotConsumeStream() throws Exception {
        final byte[] testData = "test data for validation".getBytes();

 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *
 * <p>This class extends {@link Number}, but does not define methods such as {@code
 * equals}, {@code hashCode} and {@code compareTo} because instances are expected to be mutated, and
 * so are not useful as collection keys.
 *

    if (domain.hasPublicSuffix()) {
      return new HostSpecifier(domain.toString());
    }

    throw new IllegalArgumentException(
        "Domain name does not have a recognized public suffix: " + host);
  }

  /**
   * Attempts to return a {@code HostSpecifier} for the given string, throwing an exception if

    client = TestClient(myapp)
    with pytest.raises(WebSocketDisconnect) as e:
        with client.websocket_connect("/depends-validate/"):
            pass  # pragma: no cover
    # the validation error does produce a close message
    assert e.value.code == status.WS_1008_POLICY_VIOLATION
    # and no error is leaked
    assert caught == []


def test_depend_err_middleware():
    """

		}
		if err == nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead", i+1, instanceType, testCase.err.Error())
		}
		// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
		if err != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
			if testCase.err.Error() != err.Error() {

  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see
  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //

// the [Scanner] returns it to the user. If the token is nil, the
// Scanner reads more data and continues scanning; if there is no more
// data--if atEOF was true--the [Scanner] returns. If the data does not
// yet hold a complete token, for instance if it has no newline while
// scanning lines, a [SplitFunc] can return (0, nil, nil) to signal the
// [Scanner] to read more data into the slice and try again with a

Routes are declared in a single place, using functions declared in other places (instead of using decorators that can be placed right on top of the function that handles the endpoint). This is closer to how Django does it than to how Flask (and Starlette) does it. It separates in the code things that are relatively tightly coupled.

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to