With **FastAPI**, using OpenAPI, you can define the names of these webhooks, the types of HTTP operations that your app can send (e.g. `POST`, `PUT`, etc.) and the request **bodies** that your app would send.

This can make it a lot easier for your users to **implement their APIs** to receive your **webhook** requests, they might even be able to autogenerate some of their own API code.

/// info

            "analyzer": "empty_analyzer"
          }
        }
      }
    ],
    "properties": {
      "anchor": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "boost": {
        "type": "float"
      },
      "click_count": {
        "type": "long"
      },
      "config_id": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "important_content": {
        "type": "text",

                </div>
            </div>
        </section>
    </main>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/footer.jsp"></jsp:include>
</div>
<jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/foot.jsp"></jsp:include>
</body>

                </div>
            </la:form>
        </section>
    </main>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/footer.jsp"></jsp:include>
</div>
<jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/foot.jsp"></jsp:include>
</body>

      <description>Root element of the {@code lifecycle.xml} file.</description>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>lifecycles</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <association xml.itemsStyle="flat">
            <type>Lifecycle</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>
      <name>Lifecycle</name>

    description: str | None = None
    price: float = Field(gt=0)


app = FastAPI()


@app.post("/items/")
async def create_item(item: Item, project_id: Annotated[int, Query()]): ...
```

instead of this:

```python
# DO NOT DO THIS
class Item(BaseModel):
    name: str = ...
    description: str | None = None
    price: float = Field(..., gt=0)


app = FastAPI()

 * of EventBus may be better written using <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/coroutines-guide.html">Kotlin coroutines</a>, including <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/flow.html">Flow</a> and <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/channels.html">Channels</a>. Yet other usages are better served
 * by individual libraries that provide specialized support for particular use cases.
 *

        verify(response).flushBuffer();
    }

    /**
     * Test doGet with NTLM authentication for directory listing
     * This test verifies the authentication flow without actual network operations
     */
    @Test
    void testDoGet_DirectoryListing() throws Exception {
        // Create a test-specific NetworkExplorer that mocks file operations

Найпоширеніший - неявний потік (implicit flow).

Найбезпечніший - потік коду (code flow), але його складніше реалізувати, оскільки він потребує більше кроків. Через складність багато провайдерів у підсумку радять неявний потік.

/// note | Примітка

	switch {
	case e.Int != nil:
		if *e.Int < math.MaxInt64 && *e.Int > math.MinInt64 {
			return FromInt(int64(*e.Int)), nil
		}
		return FromFloat(*e.Int), nil
	case e.Float != nil:
		return FromFloat(*e.Float), nil
	case e.String != nil:
		return FromString(string(*e.String)), nil
	case e.Boolean != nil:
		return FromBool(bool(*e.Boolean)), nil
	case e.Missing:
		return FromMissing(), nil
	}