* connection is typically faster than establishing a new one.
 *
 * When a single logical call requires multiple streams due to redirects or authorization
 * challenges, we prefer to use the same physical connection for all streams in the sequence. There
 * are potential performance and behavior consequences to this preference. To support this feature,

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")
  @ParametricNullness

    assertNull(Callables.returning(null).call());

    Object value = new Object();
    Callable<Object> callable = Callables.returning(value);
    assertSame(value, callable.call());
    // Expect the same value on subsequent calls
    assertSame(value, callable.call());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
  public void testAsAsyncCallable() throws Exception {
    String expected = "MyCallableString";

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class ListEqualsTester<E> extends AbstractListTester<E> {
  public void testEquals_otherListWithSameElements() {
    assertTrue(
        "A List should equal any other List containing the same elements.",
        getList().equals(new ArrayList<E>(getOrderedElements())));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = CollectionSize.ZERO)
  public void testEquals_otherListWithDifferentElements() {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A helper which does some thread-safe operations for aggregate futures, which must be implemented
 * differently in GWT. Namely:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Lazily initializes a set of seen exceptions
 *   <li>Decrements a counter atomically
 * </ul>
 */

   * this method returns {@code true} if {@code iterator1} and {@code iterator2} contain the same
   * number of elements and every element of {@code iterator1} is equal to the corresponding element
   * of {@code iterator2}.
   *
   * <p>Note that this will modify the supplied iterators, since they will have been advanced some
   * number of elements forward.
   */

1. Start a distributed MinIO instance (4 nodes setup)
2. Start Prometheus server and AlertManager
3. Bring down couple of MinIO instances to bring down the Erasure Set tolerance to -1 and verify the same with `mc admin prometheus metrics ALIAS | grep minio_cluster_health_erasure_set_status`

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},