1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEquals_yes() {
    assertTrue(
        "multiset doesn't equal a multiset with the same elements",
        getMultiset().equals(HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements())));
  }

  public void testEquals_differentSize() {
    Multiset<E> other = HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements());
    other.add(e0());

        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEquals_yes() {
    assertTrue(
        "multiset doesn't equal a multiset with the same elements",
        getMultiset().equals(HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements())));
  }

  public void testEquals_differentSize() {
    Multiset<E> other = HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements());
    other.add(e0());

import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Result of an upgrade strategy application.
 * Uses sets of paths to track which POMs were processed, modified, or had errors,
 * avoiding double-counting when multiple strategies affect the same POMs.
 *
 * @param processedPoms the set of POMs that were processed
 * @param modifiedPoms the set of POMs that were modified
 * @param errorPoms the set of POMs that had errors
 */

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override

   *
   * <p>The iteration order of the returned set follows the enum's iteration order, not the order in
   * which the elements appear in the given collection.
   *
   * @param elements the elements, all of the same {@code enum} type, that the set should contain
   * @return an immutable set containing those elements, minus duplicates
   */
  public static <E extends Enum<E>> ImmutableSet<E> immutableEnumSet(Iterable<E> elements) {

	dm.Unlock(t.Context())

	dm.Lock(id, source)
	time.Sleep(time.Duration(10+(rand.Float32()*50)) * time.Millisecond)
	dm.Unlock(t.Context())
}

// Test two locks for same resource, one succeeds, one fails (after timeout)
func TestTwoSimultaneousLocksForSameResource(t *testing.T) {
	dm1st := NewDRWMutex(ds, "aap")
	dm2nd := NewDRWMutex(ds, "aap")

	dm1st.Lock(id, source)

research](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=gpu+side+channel) shows that it
might be possible to use side channel attacks on the GPU to leak data from other
running models or processes in the same system. GPUs can also have
implementation bugs that might allow attackers to leave malicious code running
and leak or tamper with applications from other users. Please report

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should create response with same configuration and buffer")
        void testCreateResponseConfiguration() {
            Smb2ReadResponse response = request.createResponse(mockContext, request);
            assertNotNull(response);
            // Response should be created with the same config from context
            verify(mockContext, times(1)).getConfig();
        }

		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-append-2-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-append-2-2"}},
		&Pet{Name: "pet-slice-append-3"},
	)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, users, "Pets", 10, "After Append")

	// Replace -> same as append
	DB.Model(&users).Association("Pets").Replace(
		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-replace-1-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-replace-1-2"}},
		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-replace-2-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-replace-2-2"}},

    }

    @GwtIncompatible @J2ktIncompatible private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the tests that assume that the inverse will be the same
   * after serialization.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getInverseSameAfterSerializingMethods() {