}

		sort.Slice(user.Languages, func(i, j int) bool {
			return strings.Compare(user.Languages[i].Code, user.Languages[j].Code) > 0
		})

		sort.Slice(expect.Languages, func(i, j int) bool {
			return strings.Compare(expect.Languages[i].Code, expect.Languages[j].Code) > 0
		})
		for idx, language := range user.Languages {

		<osgi.pkg.version>${parsedVersion.majorVersion}.${parsedVersion.minorVersion}.${parsedVersion.incrementalVersion}</osgi.pkg.version>
	</properties>
	<build>
		<plugins>
			<plugin>
				<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>3.14.0</version>
				<configuration>
					<source>17</source>
					<target>17</target>
					<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
				</configuration>
			</plugin>
			<plugin>

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3.compare

import assertk.assertThat
import assertk.assertions.isEqualTo
import assertk.assertions.isNotNull
import assertk.assertions.isNull
import assertk.assertions.matches
import java.net.http.HttpClient

 *   <li>network/transfer errors</li>
 *   <li>file system errors: permissions</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * TODO carlos: all these possible has*Exceptions and get*Exceptions methods make the clients too
 *       complex requiring a long list of checks, need to create a parent/interface/encapsulation
 *       for the types of exceptions
 */
@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionResult {

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp.regression.compare

import android.net.http.ConnectionMigrationOptions
import android.net.http.DnsOptions
import android.net.http.HttpEngine
import android.net.http.HttpException
import android.net.http.QuicOptions

        byte[] buffer = new byte[10];
        int written = close.writeParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, 0);
        assertEquals(6, written, "writeParameterWordsWireFormat should return 6");
        // Only compare the first 6 bytes that were actually written
        byte[] actualWritten = new byte[6];
        System.arraycopy(buffer, 0, actualWritten, 0, 6);

        java.lang.reflect.Method[] methods = SystemUtil.class.getDeclaredMethods();
        for (java.lang.reflect.Method method : methods) {
            if (!method.isSynthetic()) { // Ignore compiler-generated methods
                assertTrue("Method " + method.getName() + " should be static", java.lang.reflect.Modifier.isStatic(method.getModifiers()));
            }
        }
    }

  @LazyInit private transient @Nullable Ordering<@Nullable Comparable<?>> nullsLast;

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(kevinb): the right way to explain this??
  public int compare(Comparable<?> left, Comparable<?> right) {
    checkNotNull(left); // for GWT
    checkNotNull(right);
    return ((Comparable<Object>) left).compareTo(right);
  }

  @Override

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Benchmarks to compare performance of MinMaxPriorityQueue and PriorityQueue.
 *
 * @author Sverre Sundsdal
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class MinMaxPriorityQueueBenchmark {
  @Param private ComparatorType comparator;