- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 51 - 60 of 157 for userDN (0.41 sec)
-
utils/tests/models.go
Friends []*User `gorm:"many2many:user_friends;"` Active bool } type Account struct { gorm.Model UserID sql.NullInt64 Number string } type Pet struct { gorm.Model UserID *uint Name string Toy Toy `gorm:"polymorphic:Owner;"` } type Toy struct { gorm.Model Name string OwnerID string OwnerType string } type Tools struct {
Registered: Sun Sep 07 09:35:13 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Dec 15 08:36:08 UTC 2023 - 2.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/ru/docs/tutorial/security/get-current-user.md
## Получение данных пользователя `get_current_user` будет использовать созданную нами (ненастоящую) служебную функцию, которая принимает токен в виде `строки` и возвращает нашу Pydantic-модель `User`: {* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial002_an_py310.py hl[19:22,26:27] *} ## Внедрение зависимости текущего пользователя
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Dec 10 10:52:27 UTC 2024 - 7.3K bytes - Viewed (0) -
cmd/admin-handlers-users-race_test.go
accessKey, secretKey := mustGenerateCredentials(c) err = s.adm.SetUser(ctx, accessKey, secretKey, madmin.AccountEnabled) if err != nil { c.Fatalf("Unable to set user: %v", err) } userReq := madmin.PolicyAssociationReq{ Policies: []string{policy}, User: accessKey, } if _, err := s.adm.AttachPolicy(ctx, userReq); err != nil { c.Fatalf("Unable to attach policy: %v", err) }
Registered: Sun Sep 07 19:28:11 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Aug 29 02:39:48 UTC 2025 - 4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/sts/ldap.md
**Please note that when AD/LDAP is configured, MinIO will not support long term users defined internally.** Only AD/LDAP users (and the root user) are allowed. In addition to this, the server will not support operations on users or groups using `mc admin user` or `mc admin group` commands except `mc admin user info` and `mc admin group info` to list set policies for users and groups. This is because users and groups are defined externally in AD/LDAP. ## Configuring AD/LDAP on MinIO
Registered: Sun Sep 07 19:28:11 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Aug 12 18:20:36 UTC 2025 - 18.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/multi-user/admin/README.md
``` Create a new admin user `admin1` on MinIO use `mc admin user`. ``` mc admin user add myminio admin1 admin123 ``` Once the user is successfully created you can now apply the `userManage` policy for this user. ``` mc admin policy attach myminio userManager --user=admin1 ``` This admin user will then be allowed to perform create/delete user operations via `mc admin user`
Registered: Sun Sep 07 19:28:11 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Aug 12 18:20:36 UTC 2025 - 4.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
api/maven-api-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/api/cli/InvokerRequest.java
* * @return the Maven installation directory path */ @Nonnull Path installationDirectory(); /** * Returns the user's home directory. * This is typically obtained from the "user.home" system property. * * @return the user's home directory path */ @Nonnull Path userHomeDirectory(); /** * Shorthand for {@link MessageBuilderFactory}. */
Registered: Sun Sep 07 03:35:12 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Jun 11 13:14:09 UTC 2025 - 6.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
src/main/resources/fess_indices/fess_user.user.json
Shinsuke Sugaya <******@****.***> 1638450896 +0900
Registered: Thu Sep 04 12:52:25 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Dec 02 13:14:56 UTC 2021 - 173 bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/pt/docs/tutorial/response-model.md
`BaseUser` tem os campos base. Então `UserIn` herda de `BaseUser` e adiciona o campo `password`, então, ele incluirá todos os campos de ambos os modelos. Anotamos o tipo de retorno da função como `BaseUser`, mas na verdade estamos retornando uma instância `UserIn`.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Nov 26 22:51:05 UTC 2024 - 16.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/es/docs/tutorial/extra-models.md
/// ### Acerca de `**user_in.dict()` #### `.dict()` de Pydantic `user_in` es un modelo Pydantic de la clase `UserIn`. Los modelos Pydantic tienen un método `.dict()` que devuelve un `dict` con los datos del modelo. Así que, si creamos un objeto Pydantic `user_in` como: ```Python user_in = UserIn(username="john", password="secret", email="******@****.***") ``` y luego llamamos a: ```Python
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Mon Dec 30 18:26:57 UTC 2024 - 7.3K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/de/docs/tutorial/response-model.md
`BaseUser` verfügt über die Basis-Felder. Dann erbt `UserIn` von `BaseUser` und fügt das Feld `Passwort` hinzu, sodass dass es nun alle Felder beider Modelle hat. Wir annotieren den Funktionsrückgabetyp als `BaseUser`, geben aber tatsächlich eine `UserIn`-Instanz zurück.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Mon Nov 18 02:25:44 UTC 2024 - 16.9K bytes - Viewed (0)