<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

---
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: bug
assignees: ''

---

(_Please use [discuss.codelibs.org](https://discuss.codelibs.org/c/FessEN/8) before filing a bug._)

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

shipped. Each file adds new lines but does not remove any.

except.txt lists features that may disappear without breaking true
compatibility.

Starting with go1.19.txt, each API feature line must end in "#nnnnn"
giving the GitHub issue number of the proposal issue that accepted
the new API. This helps with our end-of-cycle audit of new APIs.
The same requirement applies to next/* (described below), which will
become a go1.XX.txt for XX >= 19.

# Proje oluşturma - Şablonlar

Başlamak için bir proje oluşturucu kullanabilirsiniz, çünkü sizin için önceden yapılmış birçok başlangıç ​​kurulumu, güvenlik, veritabanı ve temel API endpoinlerini içerir.

Bir proje oluşturucu, her zaman kendi ihtiyaçlarınıza göre güncellemeniz ve uyarlamanız gereken esnek bir kuruluma sahip olacaktır, ancak bu, projeniz için iyi bir başlangıç ​​noktası olabilir.

## Full Stack FastAPI PostgreSQL

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

   *
   * @param q the blocking queue to be drained
   * @param buffer where to add the transferred elements
   * @param numElements the number of elements to be waited for
   * @param timeout how long to wait before giving up
   * @return the number of elements transferred
   * @throws InterruptedException if interrupted while waiting
   * @since 33.4.0 (but since 28.0 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

When the Kotlin DSL was introduced, we made an effort to add non-Groovy equivalents for all APIs.
This has been mostly done, but there remain a few holdouts (fixing these is out of scope).

To keep the Groovy DSL ergonomic, we generate methods as necessary from the non-Groovy equivalents.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:

 * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.model.building;

/**
 * Assists in firing events from a generic method by abstracting from the actual callback method to be called on the
 * listener.
 *
 * @deprecated use {@code org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

name: Bug Report
description: Something is not working as expected
labels: ["type=defect"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Thank you for filing a bug report. Please help us identify and resolve the bug by filling
        out the following fields. Before we begin, please make sure that the bug is still present in
        the [latest](https://github.com/google/guava/releases/latest) version of Guava available.