- Kubeadm: fixed a regression where the JoinConfiguration.discovery.timeout was no longer respected and the value was always hardcoded to "5m" (5 minutes). ([#125481](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125481),...

Kubernetes 1.11 also makes it easier to see what's happening, as audit events can now be annotated with information about how an API request was handled:
  * Authorization sets `authorization.k8s.io/decision` and `authorization.k8s.io/reason` annotations with the authorization decision ("allow" or "forbid") and a human-readable description of why the decision was made (for example, RBAC includes the name of the role/binding/subject which allowed a request).

    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Integer sortOrder;

    /** User who created this configuration */
    @Size(max = 1000)
    public String createdBy;

    /** Timestamp when this configuration was created */
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Long createdTime;

    /**
     * Initializes the form with default values for creating a new data configuration.
     */
    public void initialize() {

    }
  }

  abstract val path: Any

  /**
   * Reads the public suffix list treating the operation as uninterruptible. We always want to read
   * the list otherwise we'll be left in a bad state. If the thread was interrupted prior to this
   * operation, it will be re-interrupted after the list is read.
   */
  private fun readTheListUninterruptibly() {
    var interrupted = false
    try {
      while (true) {
        try {

    }

    /**
     * Validates the current request by checking for stored web API exceptions.
     * Throws any stored WebApiException if found.
     *
     * @throws WebApiException If a web API exception was previously stored
     */
    public static void validate() {
        LaRequestUtil.getOptionalRequest().map(req -> (WebApiException) req.getAttribute(WEB_API_EXCEPTION)).ifPresent(e -> {
            throw e;
        });

[19514] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19515] [INFO] Started server process [19515]
[19515] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19515] [INFO] Application startup complete.
```

</div>

Sehen wir uns an, was jede dieser Optionen bedeutet:

                assertEquals(testByte, buffer[i], "Byte at position " + i + " was modified");
            }

            // Check bytes after encoded area
            for (int i = startIndex + expectedSize; i < buffer.length; i++) {
                assertEquals(testByte, buffer[i], "Byte at position " + i + " was modified");
            }
        }

        @Test

replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA` status back to source.

In the case of versioned deletes a.k.a permanent delete of a version by doing...

   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that
   * would have required that we throw a different kind of exception for wrapping *checked*
   * exceptions in methods like Futures.getUnchecked and LoadingCache.get.)
   */

  /**

        super(andx);
        this.path = fileName;
        command = SMB_COM_OPEN_ANDX;

        desiredAccess = access & 0x3;
        if (desiredAccess == 0x3) {
            desiredAccess = 0x2; /* Mmm, I thought 0x03 was RDWR */
        }
        desiredAccess |= SHARING_DENY_NONE;
        desiredAccess &= ~0x1; // Win98 doesn't like GENERIC_READ ?! -- get Access Denied.

        // searchAttributes