* {@linkplain RangeSet#contains contained} by this range set.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> {@code a.asSet(d).equals(b.asSet(d))} does not imply {@code a.equals(b)}! For
   * example, {@code a} and {@code b} could be {@code [2..4]} and {@code (1..5)}, or the empty
   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large

      int initialArraySize) {
    checkNonnegative(initialArraySize, "initialArraySize"); // for GWT.
    return new ArrayList<>(initialArraySize);
  }

  /**
   * Creates an {@code ArrayList} instance to hold {@code estimatedSize} elements, <i>plus</i> an
   * unspecified amount of padding; **don't do this**. Instead, use {@code new }{@link
   * ArrayList#ArrayList(int) ArrayList}{@code <>(int)} directly and choose an explicit padding

                    return oldItem;
                }
                if (!item.equals(oldItem)) {
                    throw new DictionaryException("Protwords file was updated: old=" + oldItem + " : new=" + item);
                }
                try {
                    if (!item.isDeleted()) {
                        // update
                        writer.write(item.toLineString());

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

    }.also { expected ->
      when (expected) {
        is SSLHandshakeException -> {
          // On Android, the handshake fails before the certificate pinner runs.
          assertThat(expected.message!!).contains("Could not validate certificate")
        }

        is SSLPeerUnverifiedException -> {
          // On OpenJDK, the handshake succeeds but the certificate pinner fails.

    }
  }

  /*
   * For a discussion of the signature of verifyNotNull, see the discussion above
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull.
   *
   * (verifyNotNull has many fewer "problem" callers, so we could try to be stricter. On the other
   * hand, verifyNotNull arguably has more reason to accept nullable arguments in the first
   * place....)
   */

  /**

      LinkedHashMultimap<K, V> create() {
    return new LinkedHashMultimap<>(DEFAULT_KEY_CAPACITY, DEFAULT_VALUE_SET_CAPACITY);
  }

  /**
   * Constructs an empty {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with enough capacity to hold the specified
   * numbers of keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys
   * @param expectedValuesPerKey the expected average number of values per key

      LinkedHashMultimap<K, V> create() {
    return new LinkedHashMultimap<>(DEFAULT_KEY_CAPACITY, DEFAULT_VALUE_SET_CAPACITY);
  }

  /**
   * Constructs an empty {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with enough capacity to hold the specified
   * numbers of keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys
   * @param expectedValuesPerKey the expected average number of values per key