*
   * @since 11.0
   */
  void refresh(K key);

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p><b>Note that although the view <i>is</i> modifiable, no method on the returned map will ever
   * cause entries to be automatically loaded.</b>
   */
  @Override
  ConcurrentMap<K, V> asMap();

}

// TestPreparedStmtConcurrentClose test calling close and executing SQL concurrently
// this test making sure that the gorm would not get a Segmentation Fault, and the only error cause by this is using a closed Stmt
func TestPreparedStmtConcurrentClose(t *testing.T) {
	name := "prepared_stmt_concurrent_close"
	user := *GetUser(name, Config{})
	createTx := DB.Session(&gorm.Session{}).Create(&user)

                SmbConstants.DEFAULT_SHARING);

        byte[] data = new byte[10];

        // When & Then - test boundary conditions
        // Negative length or offset should not cause issues (len <= 0 returns early)
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> outputStream.write(data, 0, -1)); // negative length, returns early
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> outputStream.write(data, 0, 0)); // zero length, returns early

        try {
            // Execute operations to generate metrics
            for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
                cbWithEnhanced.executeWithCircuitBreaker(() -> "success");
            }

            // Cause some failures
            for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
                try {
                    cbWithEnhanced.executeWithCircuitBreaker(() -> {
                        throw new RuntimeException("failure");

And if your remote server or virtual machine only has 3 GB of RAM, trying to load more than 4 GB of RAM will cause problems. 🚨

### Multiple Processes - An Example { #multiple-processes-an-example }

In this example, there's a **Manager Process** that starts and controls two **Worker Processes**.

   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // String.repeat unavailable under Java 8
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {

   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // String.repeat unavailable under Java 8
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {

#   your builds. This usually saves a lot of time, especially when
#   re-running tests. However, note that:
#
#    - New environments like new CUDA versions, changes to manylinux,
#      compilers, etc. can cause undefined behavior such as build failures
#      or tests passing incorrectly.
#    - Automatic LLVM updates are known to extend build time even with
#      the cache; this is unavoidable.

                 * BCAST, Node Status) we need to augment the hashcode generated
                 * for the addresses hostname or failed lookups for one type will
                 * be cached and cause other types to fail even though they may
                 * not be the authority for the name. For example, if a WINS lookup
                 * for FOO fails and caches unknownAddress for FOO, a subsequent

const DirectioAlignSize = 4096

// CopyAligned - copies from reader to writer using the aligned input
// buffer, it is expected that input buffer is page aligned to
// 4K page boundaries. Without passing aligned buffer may cause
// this function to return error.
//
// This code is similar in spirit to io.Copy but it is only to be
// used with DIRECT I/O based file descriptor and it is expected that